Skip to content

merge queue: checking #730 on main (e6ec812), stacked on #740 - #765

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/172df64ace
Closed

mergify[bot] wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/172df64ace

Conversation

@mergify

@mergify mergify Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

#730 is queued for merge on branch main (e6ec812).

Stacked behind 1 pull request queued ahead of this batch, not part of it. These checks run on a tip that also carries its commits, so a failure here can come from it as much as from #730.

Queued ahead of this batch:

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #730.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule admin-bypass for merge:

  • check-success = lint
  • check-success = test
  • check-success = validate

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
checking_base_sha: 19a40849a84c652c748a000f095a2a250fe1a717
previous_check_retries: []
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 730
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

Invoker Bot and others added 17 commits September 16, 2026 07:07
… build-the-lever hook onto the shared hook code.

Review claim: This hook reports findings to the shared hook code, which applies its registry mode and writes event rows. It keeps mode warn.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The hook gives the same stop, warn, or silent result on every case in its current test folder, except the mode change named in this claim, and its test folder keeps exiting 0.
Effectiveness measurement: `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests` exits 0, and the new mode-override case fails before this change.
Slice rationale: One hook per workflow, as the user asked, so each migration is reviewed on its own.
Architectural effect: The build-the-lever entry scripts become thin calls into the shared runtime; its detection returns findings.
Goal: Suggests a script when many files are hand-edited. Keep that behavior while its mode moves into the registry.
Motivation: Mode and output shape live inside each hook today; the shared code makes a mode change a one-line registry edit.
Alternative considerations: Migrating several hooks per workflow was set aside because the user asked for one hook per workflow.
Implementation details: Turn this hook's detection into detect(event) returning Finding objects with stable rule ids, and make each harness entry script call run_hook from engine/hooks/_sdk/runtime.py. It keeps mode warn.
Non-goals: No change to what the hook detects. No other hook changes.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_posttooluse.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_prompt_submit.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_posttooluse.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_prompt_submit.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_before_submit.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_post_tool_use.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/detect.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_claude_hook.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_codex_hook.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_cursor_hook.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/state.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py
Change types:
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_posttooluse.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_prompt_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_posttooluse.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_prompt_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_before_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_post_tool_use.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/detect.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_claude_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_codex_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_cursor_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/state.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests` exits 0.
- With CATSTACK_HOOK_MODE_BUILD_THE_LEVER set to warn, a case that stops today produces a warning instead, proving the registry mode drives the response.
- Each finding writes one event row with the hook's rule_id.

Solution:
  Put the build-the-lever hook onto the shared hook code.
Review claim: This hook reports findings to the shared hook code, which applies its registry mode and writes event rows. It keeps mode warn.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The hook gives the same stop, warn, or silent result on every case in its current test folder, except the mode change named in this claim, and its test folder keeps exiting 0.
Effectiveness measurement: `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests` exits 0, and the new mode-override case fails before this change.
Slice rationale: One hook per workflow, as the user asked, so each migration is reviewed on its own.
Architectural effect: The build-the-lever entry scripts become thin calls into the shared runtime; its detection returns findings.
Goal: Suggests a script when many files are hand-edited. Keep that behavior while its mode moves into the registry.
Motivation: Mode and output shape live inside each hook today; the shared code makes a mode change a one-line registry edit.
Alternative considerations: Migrating several hooks per workflow was set aside because the user asked for one hook per workflow.
Implementation details: Turn this hook's detection into detect(event) returning Finding objects with stable rule ids, and make each harness entry script call run_hook from engine/hooks/_sdk/runtime.py. It keeps mode warn.
Non-goals: No change to what the hook detects. No other hook changes.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_posttooluse.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_prompt_submit.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_posttooluse.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_prompt_submit.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_before_submit.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_post_tool_use.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/detect.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_claude_hook.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_codex_hook.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_cursor_hook.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/state.py, engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py
Change types:
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_posttooluse.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/claude_prompt_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_posttooluse.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/codex_prompt_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_before_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/cursor_post_tool_use.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/detect.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_claude_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_codex_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/install_cursor_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/state.py: modify
- engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests` exits 0.
- With CATSTACK_HOOK_MODE_BUILD_THE_LEVER set to warn, a case that stops today produces a warning instead, proving the registry mode drives the response.
- Each finding writes one event row with the hook's rule_id.

Invoker-Finalize-Id: 35d0555b-3f55-47f9-9e41-97f12e84dc55
…terministic proof for put the build-the-lever hook onto the shared hook code.

Review claim: The proof exits 0 only when put the build-the-lever hook onto the shared hook code holds.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Proof only; it changes no product behavior.
Effectiveness measurement: The exit status of `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/build-the-lever/tests` is the signal for this slice.
Slice rationale: One proof unit for this workflow.
Architectural effect: None; verification only.
Goal: Prove put the build-the-lever hook onto the shared hook code with one deterministic run.
Motivation: Each workflow carries its own proof so a reviewer can trust the slice alone.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Execute the proof as a terminal gate.
Non-goals: No product edits here.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 3fe2349d-7d5a-4cf2-a6ab-f4c370ef2d0f
…only gate confirming no ephemeral handoff files were left behind.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no ephemeral handoff files in the tree.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Read-only; it never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: A non-zero exit when ephemeral handoff files remain is the signal.
Slice rationale: One unit: the hygiene gate.
Architectural effect: None.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files remain after every other task finishes.
Motivation: Ephemeral inter-task files leak into the diff and read as part of the change.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh in check mode.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 70147de4-ee65-46de-90da-48ab84cce9d0
…ae3e57046-efa4e452 — Terminal read-only gate confirming no ephemeral handoff files were left behind.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no ephemeral handoff files in the tree.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Read-only; it never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: A non-zero exit when ephemeral handoff files remain is the signal.
Slice rationale: One unit: the hygiene gate.
Architectural effect: None.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files remain after every other task finishes.
Motivation: Ephemeral inter-task files leak into the diff and read as part of the change.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh in check mode.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active
…e cat-mode-default hook onto the shared hook code.

Review claim: This hook reports findings to the shared hook code, which applies its registry mode and writes event rows. It keeps mode warn.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The hook gives the same stop, warn, or silent result on every case in its current test folder, except the mode change named in this claim, and its test folder keeps exiting 0.
Effectiveness measurement: `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests` exits 0, and the new mode-override case fails before this change.
Slice rationale: One hook per workflow, as the user asked, so each migration is reviewed on its own.
Architectural effect: The cat-mode-default entry scripts become thin calls into the shared runtime; its detection returns findings.
Goal: Applies the user's working style each turn. Keep that behavior while its mode moves into the registry.
Motivation: Mode and output shape live inside each hook today; the shared code makes a mode change a one-line registry edit.
Alternative considerations: Migrating several hooks per workflow was set aside because the user asked for one hook per workflow.
Implementation details: Turn this hook's detection into detect(event) returning Finding objects with stable rule ids, and make each harness entry script call run_hook from engine/hooks/_sdk/runtime.py. It keeps mode warn.
Non-goals: No change to what the hook detects. No other hook changes.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_pretooluse_agent.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_prompt_submit.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/detect.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/install_claude_hook.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py
Change types:
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_pretooluse_agent.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_prompt_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/detect.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/install_claude_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests` exits 0.
- With CATSTACK_HOOK_MODE_CAT_MODE_DEFAULT set to warn, a case that stops today produces a warning instead, proving the registry mode drives the response.
- Each finding writes one event row with the hook's rule_id.

Solution:
  Put the cat-mode-default hook onto the shared hook code.
Review claim: This hook reports findings to the shared hook code, which applies its registry mode and writes event rows. It keeps mode warn.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The hook gives the same stop, warn, or silent result on every case in its current test folder, except the mode change named in this claim, and its test folder keeps exiting 0.
Effectiveness measurement: `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests` exits 0, and the new mode-override case fails before this change.
Slice rationale: One hook per workflow, as the user asked, so each migration is reviewed on its own.
Architectural effect: The cat-mode-default entry scripts become thin calls into the shared runtime; its detection returns findings.
Goal: Applies the user's working style each turn. Keep that behavior while its mode moves into the registry.
Motivation: Mode and output shape live inside each hook today; the shared code makes a mode change a one-line registry edit.
Alternative considerations: Migrating several hooks per workflow was set aside because the user asked for one hook per workflow.
Implementation details: Turn this hook's detection into detect(event) returning Finding objects with stable rule ids, and make each harness entry script call run_hook from engine/hooks/_sdk/runtime.py. It keeps mode warn.
Non-goals: No change to what the hook detects. No other hook changes.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_pretooluse_agent.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_prompt_submit.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/detect.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/install_claude_hook.py, engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py
Change types:
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_pretooluse_agent.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/claude_prompt_submit.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/detect.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/install_claude_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests` exits 0.
- With CATSTACK_HOOK_MODE_CAT_MODE_DEFAULT set to warn, a case that stops today produces a warning instead, proving the registry mode drives the response.
- Each finding writes one event row with the hook's rule_id.

Invoker-Finalize-Id: a0c6917e-a7c5-46f3-a6a1-b370f2d14108
…eterministic proof for put the cat-mode-default hook onto the shared hook code.

Review claim: The proof exits 0 only when put the cat-mode-default hook onto the shared hook code holds.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Proof only; it changes no product behavior.
Effectiveness measurement: The exit status of `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/cat-mode-default/tests` is the signal for this slice.
Slice rationale: One proof unit for this workflow.
Architectural effect: None; verification only.
Goal: Prove put the cat-mode-default hook onto the shared hook code with one deterministic run.
Motivation: Each workflow carries its own proof so a reviewer can trust the slice alone.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Execute the proof as a terminal gate.
Non-goals: No product edits here.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 8132f734-9bf7-4d89-8c3c-56bc4b969d79
…only gate confirming no ephemeral handoff files were left behind.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no ephemeral handoff files in the tree.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Read-only; it never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: A non-zero exit when ephemeral handoff files remain is the signal.
Slice rationale: One unit: the hygiene gate.
Architectural effect: None.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files remain after every other task finishes.
Motivation: Ephemeral inter-task files leak into the diff and read as part of the change.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh in check mode.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 74c962cc-f188-4db3-be0c-c3da68c20e9a
…a23c8b9a3-964c6d87 — Terminal read-only gate confirming no ephemeral handoff files were left behind.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no ephemeral handoff files in the tree.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Read-only; it never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: A non-zero exit when ephemeral handoff files remain is the signal.
Slice rationale: One unit: the hygiene gate.
Architectural effect: None.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files remain after every other task finishes.
Motivation: Ephemeral inter-task files leak into the diff and read as part of the change.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh in check mode.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active
… Put the categorical-scope-guard hook onto the shared hook code.

Review claim: This hook reports findings to the shared hook code, which applies its registry mode and writes event rows. It keeps mode stop.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The hook gives the same stop, warn, or silent result on every case in its current test folder, except the mode change named in this claim, and its test folder keeps exiting 0.
Effectiveness measurement: `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests` exits 0, and the new mode-override case fails before this change.
Slice rationale: One hook per workflow, as the user asked, so each migration is reviewed on its own.
Architectural effect: The categorical-scope-guard entry scripts become thin calls into the shared runtime; its detection returns findings.
Goal: Stops a change that covers only part of an all request. Keep that behavior while its mode moves into the registry.
Motivation: Mode and output shape live inside each hook today; the shared code makes a mode change a one-line registry edit.
Alternative considerations: Migrating several hooks per workflow was set aside because the user asked for one hook per workflow.
Implementation details: Turn this hook's detection into detect(event) returning Finding objects with stable rule ids, and make each harness entry script call run_hook from engine/hooks/_sdk/runtime.py. It keeps mode stop.
Non-goals: No change to what the hook detects. No other hook changes.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/claude_pretooluse.py, engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/detect.py, engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/install_claude_hook.py, engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py
Change types:
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/claude_pretooluse.py: modify
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/detect.py: modify
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/install_claude_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests` exits 0.
- With CATSTACK_HOOK_MODE_CATEGORICAL_SCOPE_GUARD set to warn, a case that stops today produces a warning instead, proving the registry mode drives the response.
- Each finding writes one event row with the hook's rule_id.

Solution:
  Put the categorical-scope-guard hook onto the shared hook code.
Review claim: This hook reports findings to the shared hook code, which applies its registry mode and writes event rows. It keeps mode stop.
Review lane: behavior
Safety invariant: The hook gives the same stop, warn, or silent result on every case in its current test folder, except the mode change named in this claim, and its test folder keeps exiting 0.
Effectiveness measurement: `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests` exits 0, and the new mode-override case fails before this change.
Slice rationale: One hook per workflow, as the user asked, so each migration is reviewed on its own.
Architectural effect: The categorical-scope-guard entry scripts become thin calls into the shared runtime; its detection returns findings.
Goal: Stops a change that covers only part of an all request. Keep that behavior while its mode moves into the registry.
Motivation: Mode and output shape live inside each hook today; the shared code makes a mode change a one-line registry edit.
Alternative considerations: Migrating several hooks per workflow was set aside because the user asked for one hook per workflow.
Implementation details: Turn this hook's detection into detect(event) returning Finding objects with stable rule ids, and make each harness entry script call run_hook from engine/hooks/_sdk/runtime.py. It keeps mode stop.
Non-goals: No change to what the hook detects. No other hook changes.
Layer: domain
Feature state: active
Files: engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/claude_pretooluse.py, engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/detect.py, engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/install_claude_hook.py, engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py
Change types:
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/claude_pretooluse.py: modify
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/detect.py: modify
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/install_claude_hook.py: modify
- engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests/test_hooks_sdk_mode.py: create
Acceptance criteria:
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests` exits 0.
- With CATSTACK_HOOK_MODE_CATEGORICAL_SCOPE_GUARD set to warn, a case that stops today produces a warning instead, proving the registry mode drives the response.
- Each finding writes one event row with the hook's rule_id.

Invoker-Finalize-Id: 1540cec2-0149-477b-b36f-03c02bb58574
…n the deterministic proof for put the categorical-scope-guard hook onto the shared hook code.

Review claim: The proof exits 0 only when put the categorical-scope-guard hook onto the shared hook code holds.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Proof only; it changes no product behavior.
Effectiveness measurement: The exit status of `python3 -m unittest discover -s engine/hooks/categorical-scope-guard/tests` is the signal for this slice.
Slice rationale: One proof unit for this workflow.
Architectural effect: None; verification only.
Goal: Prove put the categorical-scope-guard hook onto the shared hook code with one deterministic run.
Motivation: Each workflow carries its own proof so a reviewer can trust the slice alone.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Execute the proof as a terminal gate.
Non-goals: No product edits here.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 30fc01e9-dbf4-4302-9c20-a786ccb160ef
…only gate confirming no ephemeral handoff files were left behind.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no ephemeral handoff files in the tree.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Read-only; it never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: A non-zero exit when ephemeral handoff files remain is the signal.
Slice rationale: One unit: the hygiene gate.
Architectural effect: None.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files remain after every other task finishes.
Motivation: Ephemeral inter-task files leak into the diff and read as part of the change.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh in check mode.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active

Exit code: 0
Invoker-Finalize-Id: 85155944-670a-40b9-a845-1252af44dacd
…ad1e0ee86-5f6e3e25 — Terminal read-only gate confirming no ephemeral handoff files were left behind.

Review claim: The workflow leaves no ephemeral handoff files in the tree.
Review lane: proof
Safety invariant: Read-only; it never deletes files, alters the index, or commits caller work.
Effectiveness measurement: A non-zero exit when ephemeral handoff files remain is the signal.
Slice rationale: One unit: the hygiene gate.
Architectural effect: None.
Goal: Confirm no ephemeral handoff files remain after every other task finishes.
Motivation: Ephemeral inter-task files leak into the diff and read as part of the change.
Alternative considerations: Manual inspection was set aside as non-deterministic.
Implementation details: Run scripts/scrub-handoff-artifacts.sh in check mode.
Non-goals: No deletion, no index changes, no commits.
Layer: e2e_regression
Feature state: active
An answer already written down costs one read. Add the learned rule and a
test that pins it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I8831f9085cdb5fe672f820dbe96186ca5dc74b29
…e-15-put-the-categorical-scope-guard-hook-onto-the-shared-hook-code

Change-Id: I5b7e84437cae5ef1a737146b5366119f4c82ba7d

# Conflicts:
#	engine/hooks/_sdk/runtime.py
…CHECKED

check_no_silent_hook_except flagged the broad handler in detect() because it
returned a finding without writing the error to stderr.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I10e84179b9915593bd69889b7ebe3ebdaed05060
@mergify mergify Bot closed this Sep 17, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/172df64ace branch September 17, 2026 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant