Skip to content

Add NaCzarter to Websites - #14

Open
marczynski wants to merge 1 commit into
webmachinelearning:mainfrom
marczynski:add-naczarter-website
Open

Add NaCzarter to Websites#14
marczynski wants to merge 1 commit into
webmachinelearning:mainfrom
marczynski:add-naczarter-website

Conversation

@marczynski

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Websites section was empty, so here's a first entry. We run a yacht-charter business on the Masurian Lakes (naczarter.pl) and put WebMCP tools into production this week — an agent can search availability, get a live quote and start a booking. Kept it to one line to match the convention in the rest of the file; happy to adjust the wording.

@anssiko

anssiko commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before including your site, it would be good to see some developer docs and/or technical blog post that expands on your site's WebMCP usage and adoption journey.

@marczynski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks, fair point. WebMCP is already running in production on NaCzarter. We currently expose four tools: search_charters, get_charter_details, quote_charter, and book_charter, covering the full flow from search to a provisional booking.
The current setup is documented in our llms.txt, and the same tools are available through our MCP endpoint at https://naczarter.pl/api/mcp.
Would that be enough for the listing?

@anssiko

anssiko commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some developer documentation, in English, would be good for the target audience of this list. The idea of this curated list is to showcase a diverse set of sites that make use of WebMCP in their unique ways. The site that you represent is definitely not mainstream, thus a good candidate. We want to avoid adding sites just for marketing the business itself, but provide real-world examples of WebMCP adoption across industries.

@marczynski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for clarifying, Anssi. I've added English developer documentation covering browser registration, tool schemas, runnable examples and what changed during integration.

The write-up explains how the tools reuse our booking logic, including stay restrictions and the split between the online price and fees paid at the port.

One clarification to my earlier reply: the remote MCP endpoint is separate and read-only. book_charter is available through browser WebMCP, with an in-page confirmation before a reservation is created. Payment remains a separate step.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants