Skip to content

fix: preserve forecast learning and prepare robust EV planning - #1232

Merged
frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/beta4-robustness-20260913
Sep 13, 2026
Merged

frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/beta4-robustness-20260913

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The beta.4 audit found three Core defects: both-zero battery overrides raised known driver caps, the forecast hash change discarded compatible learning, and a stale or incomplete power balance could overwrite current-slot household load.

Keep each known battery limit in planning and dispatch. Preserve the old learning ID only when the exact beta.3 binding proves a compatible upgrade; keep that binding across restart and still invalidate it when the measurement setup changes. Use the shared qualified telemetry snapshot for live household load.

Pair with https://github.com/srcfl/energyplan/pull/27. The bundle pins Energyplan 0.4.5 at bde1609415c132a857e1997d1422aad0ee1532fe for Linux ARM64, Linux AMD64 and macOS ARM64. EV goals share capacity across deadlines and return safe partial plans with explicit shortfall. Core validates the charger's actual pulse power and the exact energy budget. Private solver source and tests remain in Energyplan.

Local validation: make verify passes, including native optimizer/forecast tests, fault injection, plan validation, migration tests, vet and build. New tests cover the reported defects, persistent upgrade bindings, missing flows and shared EV deadlines. A captured 193-slot site request ran on Raspberry Pi in 2.14 s; the 500 ms budget also returned a feasible plan in 0.524 s. Both planned the full EV goal. Core replay checks the hardware-produced responses separately. These are isolated worker runs, not a completed charging session.

Fredrik chose local verification while the private repository's GitHub Actions account is limited. No beta has been published or installed. Merge the paired changes before preparing the next version through Changesets. Learning already overwritten by an earlier beta needs a matching backup; this change does not reconstruct lost samples.

Closes #1229. Closes #1230. Closes #1231.

Signed-off-by: Fredrik Ahlgren <fredrik@sourceful-labs.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-13T11:49:05.302641Z f2874ff PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@frahlg
frahlg merged commit accb746 into master Sep 13, 2026
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant