Skip to content

docs: record the first FTW vision delivery - #1216

Merged
frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/vision-delivery-status-20260912
Sep 12, 2026
Merged

frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/vision-delivery-status-20260912

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Record the first merged delivery against the new FTW direction: Core #1170 and #1199, plus webapp #57. Separate verified code and browser results from physical qualification and release status. Keep the next product outcome focused on direct SoC entry, accepted plans and missed-departure risk, tested with recurring goals and restart recovery.

Documentation only. Diff whitespace and repository hygiene checks pass; the linked PRs contain the implementation and validation evidence.


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only roadmap update; no runtime, API, or product behavior changes.

Overview
Adds a First delivery after the review section to docs/roadmap.md that records what shipped after the September implementation review.

It links merged Core PRs #1170 and #1199 (missing-SoC through final dispatch, offline devices excluded from load, curtailment meter freshness, Lua host command/safe-default rules, 40-driver recovery pin with startup-contract coverage) and webapp #57 (manual mode with Use the plan, distinct sending vs confirmed state, non-overlapping mode changes on the same control revision).

The new text states that make verify/CI and webapp verification (including simulator browser run) close confirmed code defects but do not mean physical safe-default qualification, full daily charging, or release—and keeps the reviewed baseline section as the original comparison point. Next product work is reiterated: direct post-plug-in SoC, accepted-plan feedback, missed-departure risk, with recurring goals, Charge now, and restart recovery tested on a named charger with an offline car.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 1e22166. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Signed-off-by: Fredrik Ahlgren <fredrik@sourceful-labs.com>
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_6824f92a-8525-4c59-bec0-9e3307910678)

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-12T10:35:28.857991Z 1e22166 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@frahlg
frahlg merged commit 0f84599 into master Sep 12, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant