Skip to content

fix(updater): preserve retirement output and custom service names - #1086

Merged
frahlg merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
fix/python-retirement-diagnostics
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

frahlg merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
fix/python-retirement-diagnostics

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The Python retirement helper used the updater's short status-log output and a fixed service name. Startup logs could hide the final error or backup path, and a renamed updater could not run retirement.

Stream the full command output, report only backups that were created, and use the image-based updater service lookup. Accept the published compatibility image as well as canonical and mirrored updater images. This fixes the follow-up findings on #1083. make verify passed, including a regression case with a renamed updater and mirrored image. The first beta's retirement command has also removed Python on the Pi 4; this keeps the same migration and improves its output and service lookup.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-07T08:52:49.855026Z 4c7bd7d PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4c7bd7db20

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread go/cmd/ftw-updater/retire_python.go
@frahlg
frahlg merged commit 63185d0 into master Sep 7, 2026
16 checks passed

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a non-blocking comment; this automation did not approve. Cursor Bugbot completed with no findings, but the repo approval policy still requires a CODEOWNERS review. Assigned the CODEOWNER for the changed .github/ path.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a non-blocking comment; this automation did not approve. Cursor Bugbot completed with no findings, but the repo approval policy still requires a CODEOWNERS review rather than auto-approval. Assigned the CODEOWNER for the changed .github/ path.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant