Skip to content

docs(planning): adds phase-17 for showing labels in lc issue list/view - #257

Merged
bougyman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wtf-labels
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

docs(planning): adds phase-17 for showing labels in lc issue list/view#257
bougyman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wtf-labels

Conversation

@bougyman

@bougyman bougyman commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 7, 2026 09:00

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The change is documentation-only with no functional impact, and the only noted issue is a small grammatical nit.

Pull request overview

Adds a new Phase 17 planning document describing how lc issue list/view should support showing labels independently from label filtering, including the motivating failure mode and a proposed implementation/test plan.

Changes:

  • Introduces documents/phase-17-plan.adoc with the Phase 17 goal, decisions, and acceptance criteria.
  • Documents the proposed -i/--include-labels presentation flag and how it composes with existing -l/--labels filtering and -s/--status.
File summaries
File Description
documents/phase-17-plan.adoc New Phase 17 plan documenting CLI contract, implementation approach, tests, and acceptance criteria for label display vs filtering.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread documents/phase-17-plan.adoc
@bougyman
bougyman merged commit aa03320 into main Sep 7, 2026
4 checks passed
@bougyman
bougyman deleted the wtf-labels branch September 7, 2026 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants