Skip to content

[Bug]: GC hangs for a slotted Python subclass of a native weak-reference type #1157

Description

@Zaczero

Describe the bug

A Python subclass with a nonempty __slots__ tuple can expose one weak-reference offset through its Python type while its native type representation exposes a different offset. If an ordinary native object field occupies the native offset, cyclic garbage collection can treat that field as the weak-reference list and fail to complete.

The standalone reproducer uses only the Python C API. It defines a heap type with an ordinary integer field before a Python reference field and weak-reference field, then creates a Python subclass with __slots__ = ("extra",). The subclass reports:

Python layout: 48 32
Native layout: (48, 24)

After assigning the ordinary Python reference field to the instance itself, gc.collect() does not return within 15 seconds.

This can affect extension classes that support both subclassing and weak references. An unreachable cycle can hang collection rather than being reclaimed.

Operating system

Linux

CPU architecture

x86_64

GraalPy version

25.3.4.1, Python 3.13.14, sys.implementation.version == 25.3.4, source revision 6bd9d25023bf713ae3dd7e83ee620c897a2c51d0

JDK version

25.0.4.1

Context configuration

No response

Steps to reproduce

Place the attached gc_probe.c and reproduce_runtime_gc.py in one directory, then run:

graalpy reproduce_runtime_gc.py graal-subclass

The script compiles the extension using the selected interpreter's headers and runs collection in a subprocess with a 15-second timeout.

Observed output:

3.13.14 (Wed Aug 19 15:15:54 UTC 2026)
[Graal, GraalVM CE, Java 25.0.4.1 (amd64)]
Python layout: 48 32
Native layout: (48, 24)
collecting
Collection did not return within 15 seconds.

The command exits with status 124.

gc_probe.c

reproduce_runtime_gc.py

Expected behavior

The Python-visible and native weak-reference offsets should describe the same object layout, and collection should return after reclaiming the unreachable self-cycle.

Stack trace

Additional context

No response

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions