add override capabilities to repeated capabilities documentation

[elebel-emerson]

• This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.

- [ ] I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.

• I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Change generated Repeated Capabilities documentation to support metadata-defined descriptions, examples, and identifier guidance for capability-specific behavior.

What testing has been done?

Manually testing change in config.py propagates to html documentation
Create a unit test

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.24%. Comparing base (ab52ec6) to head (9cd7344).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (ab52ec6) and HEAD (9cd7344). Click for more details.

HEAD has 17 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (ab52ec6)	HEAD (9cd7344)
codegenunittests	1	0
nifakeunittests	5	4
nidcpowerunittests	5	4
nidigitalunittests	5	4
nimodinstunittests	5	4
niscopeunittests	5	4
nitclkunittests	5	4
nimodinstsystemtests	1	0
niscopesystemtests	1	0
niswitchsystemtests	1	0
nirfsgsystemtests	1	0
nidigitalsystemtests	1	0
nisesystemtests	1	0
nifgensystemtests	1	0
nidmmsystemtests	1	0
nidcpowersystemtests	1	0
nitclksystemtests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2183      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.85%   80.24%   -9.62%     
==========================================
  Files          73       19      -54     
  Lines       19006     2500   -16506     
==========================================
- Hits        17077     2006   -15071     
+ Misses       1929      494    -1435     

Flag	Coverage Δ
codegenunittests	?
nidcpowersystemtests	?
nidcpowerunittests	89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests	?
nidigitalunittests	68.44% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests	?
nifakeunittests	86.01% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests	?
nimodinstsystemtests	?
nimodinstunittests	94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests	?
niscopesystemtests	?
niscopeunittests	43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests	?
niswitchsystemtests	?
nitclksystemtests	?
nitclkunittests	98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 58 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ab52ec6...9cd7344. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ni-jfitzger]

Why are you changing the file modes of our metadata files?

[ni-jfitzger]

Note: if you pull the latest changes, the system tests will pass.
Not really a requirement for this change, but the PR Checks would look better.

[elebel-emerson]

Why are you changing the file modes of our metadata files?

I did not explicitly touch those files, doing tox -e codegen touched those files, and I just committed.
Removed the changed to file mode in 92b5d19

[elebel-emerson]

Note: if you pull the latest changes, the system tests will pass. Not really a requirement for this change, but the PR Checks would look better.

git pull origin says I am up to date with origin. Still one failing change that does not seem correlated to this change

[ni-jfitzger]

Note: if you pull the latest changes, the system tests will pass. Not really a requirement for this change, but the PR Checks would look better.

git pull origin says I am up to date with origin. Still one failing change that does not seem correlated to this change

Yeah, any system test failures are unrelated to your changes. You haven't touched the API or the System Tests.

[marcoskirsch]

"overwrite" should be "override" (nim-python terminology)

[marcoskirsch]

You are missing a NI-FAKE example

[elebel-emerson]

"overwrite" should be "override" (nim-python terminology)

Hopefully changed all instances of "overwrite" to "override"

You are missing a NI-FAKE example

Added unit tests in test_rep_caps_template.py