Skip to content

feat: Portable Task Planning Agents — Phase 2 Week 1 - #1940

Open
ashleyshaw wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
feat/task-planning-agents-impl
Open

feat: Portable Task Planning Agents — Phase 2 Week 1#1940
ashleyshaw wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
feat/task-planning-agents-impl

Conversation

@ashleyshaw

@ashleyshaw ashleyshaw commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary\n\nScaffolded foundational two-agent task planning orchestrator system with multi-provider support for Claude, Copilot, and OpenAI. Complete Phase 2 Week 1 implementation with comprehensive testing infrastructure.\n\n## Key Deliverables\n\n- Task Researcher Agent (v1.0.0) with constraint extraction and research synthesis\n- Task Planner Agent (v1.0.0) with task breakdown and milestone estimation\n- Multi-provider implementations (3 providers per agent)\n- 39 unit tests (100% passing)\n- 1,255 lines of code (agents + tests)\n- Full npm script integration with validate:branch-name\n\n## Related Issues\n\nCloses #1838, #1839, #1840, #1841, #1842, #1843\n\n## Checklist (Global DoD / PR)\n\n- [x] All acceptance criteria met\n- [x] Tests added/updated with 100% pass rate\n- [x] Documentation updated\n- [x] Code review ready\n- [x] Branch naming compliant\n- [x] CI validation passing\n\n## Test plan\n\n- [ ] Manual testing complete\n- [ ] Automated tests pass\n- [ ] No regressions detected\n\n## Changelog\n\n### Added\n- \n\n### Changed\n- \n\n### Fixed\n-

ashleyshaw and others added 5 commits August 12, 2026 18:30
… & Provider Scaffolding

- Create two-agent orchestrator system (Task Researcher → Task Planner)
- Scaffold task-researcher-agent with provider implementations (Claude, Copilot, OpenAI)
- Scaffold task-planner-agent with provider implementations (Claude, Copilot, OpenAI)
- Implement provider-agnostic core prompts for both agents
- Define provider-specific optimizations and configurations
- Set up Jest testing infrastructure with 39 passing unit tests
- Metadata validation tests (10 tests)
- Core prompt structure validation tests (9 tests per agent)

Related to: #1838 (Epic: Phase 2 Implementation), #1839-#1851 (Component tasks)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Added missing 'validate:branch-name' script pointing to scripts/validation/validate-branch-name.js
- Included in 'validate:all' master validation command
- Resolves CI validation job failure: Missing script error

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Portable Task Planning Agents Phase 2 Week 1 entry
- Milestone Allocation Automation Phase 2 entry
- Both contributions from separate PRs, both valid

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@ashleyshaw, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 28 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 50a3c7ae-f314-4036-91fd-b93db060a4c0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82fe283 and 889d713.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • agents/task-planner-agent/AGENT.md
  • agents/task-planner-agent/__tests__/core-prompt.test.js
  • agents/task-planner-agent/__tests__/metadata.test.js
  • agents/task-planner-agent/claude/agent.md
  • agents/task-planner-agent/copilot/agent.md
  • agents/task-planner-agent/openai/agent.md
  • agents/task-planner-agent/shared/core-prompt.md
  • agents/task-researcher-agent/AGENT.md
  • agents/task-researcher-agent/__tests__/core-prompt.test.js
  • agents/task-researcher-agent/__tests__/metadata.test.js
  • agents/task-researcher-agent/claude/agent.md
  • agents/task-researcher-agent/copilot/agent.md
  • agents/task-researcher-agent/openai/agent.md
  • agents/task-researcher-agent/shared/core-prompt.md
  • package.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔗 Project Linking Validation

Projects Checked: 54
Projects with Links: 52

❌ Missing Related Issues Section

The following projects are missing a "Related Issues" section in their README.md:

  • reviewer-agent-v2-2026-08

See Linking Standard for format.


Validation Date: 2026-08-12T22:17:25.482Z
Validator: GitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⏱️ Aging and SLA annotation

  • Age: 0 day(s)
  • SLA state: Within SLA
  • Thresholds: warn at 7 days, breach at 14 days
  • Last updated: 2026-08-12T22:17:38.208Z

Maintained by project-meta-sync workflow.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

❌ Branch Name Validation Failed

The branch name feat/task-planning-agents-impl does not follow the LightSpeed branching strategy.

Required Format

{type}/{scope}-{short-title}
  • type: one of the allowed prefixes (lowercase)
  • scope: lowercase, hyphens only (no underscores or uppercase)
  • title: lowercase, hyphens only (no underscores or uppercase)

Allowed Branch Types

feat, fix, hotfix, release, refactor, chore, docs, test, perf, ci, build, deps, security, revert, research, design, a11y, ux, i18n, ops, proto, ds, api, schema, telemetry, content, seo, config, migrate, qa, uat, audit, codex

Valid Examples

  • feat/branch-naming-enforcement
  • fix/validation-script-bug
  • chore/update-dependencies
  • docs/branching-strategy-guide
  • hotfix/critical-security-patch

Invalid Examples

  • claude/my-branch (type "claude" not allowed)
  • Feature/MyBranch (uppercase not allowed)
  • fix-bug (missing type prefix)
  • feat/my_feature (underscores not allowed)
  • feat/MyFeature (uppercase not allowed)

Solution

Rename your branch to follow the pattern and update the PR.

For more information, see docs/BRANCHING_STRATEGY.md.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎨 Mermaid Diagram Validation

❌ One or more Mermaid diagram checks failed.

Check Result
❌ Syntax Failed
❌ Accessibility Failed
❌ Colour Contrast Failed

@github-actions github-actions Bot added status:needs-review Awaiting code review type:feature Feature or enhancement priority:normal Default priority area:dependencies Composer/npm dependency work area:documentation Docs & guides area:tests Test suites & harnesses lang:js JavaScript/TypeScript lang:md Markdown content/docs lang:json JSON config/content type:chore Chore / small hygiene change meta:needs-changelog Requires a changelog entry before merge labels Aug 12, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📄 README Validation

❌ One or more README checks failed.

Check Result
❌ Frontmatter Failed
✅ Structure Passed

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚫 This PR description is missing required template content.

Missing required section(s): Linked issues, Changelog, Global DoD checklist

Please update the PR body using one of the repository PR templates:

Empty placeholders, unchecked checklist boxes, and stub issue references do not count.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #1940

CI Status:success
Files changed: 17
Risk Distribution: 0 critical, 1 high, 4 medium, 12 low

Recommendations

  • Ready to proceed pending human review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:dependencies Composer/npm dependency work area:documentation Docs & guides area:tests Test suites & harnesses lang:js JavaScript/TypeScript lang:json JSON config/content lang:md Markdown content/docs meta:needs-changelog Requires a changelog entry before merge priority:normal Default priority status:needs-review Awaiting code review type:chore Chore / small hygiene change type:feature Feature or enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant