Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
41 changes: 41 additions & 0 deletions linkedin-posts/personal/agents-picked-wrong-thing.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
---
title: "I let my agents pick our next product. They were wrong about the wrong thing."
lane: personal
pillar: build-in-public
author: paul-keen
voice: personal-first-person
icp_test: Does "the research told us what to build, not whether we'd want to" land, and do founders share their own version of this mistake?
first_comment: |
(value post - no link; reply-CTA only)
utm_campaign: ""
utm_content: agents_picked_wrong_thing
status: draft
stage: next
proposed_for: "2026-09-01 17:00 CEST"
notes: |
Pillar: build-in-public (the 70% value; NO course link). From Paul's real work
2026-08-24: he ran a multi-agent research sprint (5 parallel agents) to find the
best business to build in 2026 with a dev team but no spare millions. Reports came
back solid - market size, sources, risk scores. The turn: not one answered the real
question (would we want to do it for five years). MCP detail added as concrete hook:
we can wire a client's DB/Stripe/Salesforce into an off-the-shelf agent in days, no
ML research; MCP ecosystem grew ~900% in 2025 (colrows / CData). Point: do what we
already know how to do, package it differently - not chase "idea of the year." Ends on
a question, no bait CTA. Plain English, one committed idea, no banned words.
---

I had my agents run a research sprint this weekend. The question: what business actually makes sense to build in 2026 if you have a dev team but no spare millions to burn.

A couple of hours later, five reports landed. Market size, sources, risk scores - all very solid.

Then I read them and caught the mistake. Not one of those reports answered the real question. They told me where the demand is. None of them told me whether I'd want to do that thing for five years straight.

The tooling makes this fast now. Take MCP - the protocol that lets an AI agent talk to your own systems. We can wire a client's database, Stripe, Salesforce into an off-the-shelf agent in a few days. No machine-learning research, just engineering we already do every week. The ecosystem grew something like 900% last year. Everyone wants agents that touch their own data.

But speed like that doesn't help with the hard part. The hard part is being honest with yourself.

For JetThoughts the answer was both obvious and uncomfortable. Do what we already know how to do - just sell it differently. Not chase the idea of the year. Build the boring connector, ship it, keep the client on a retainer.

Maybe the most underrated skill right now isn't picking up a new stack. It's giving yourself permission to say no to the extra thing.

What are you cutting this year instead of taking on?
Loading