Apart for the required development effort, is there a technical reason not to support std::string_view names in the API ?
There is no implicit conversion from string_view to string which means that string_view names must be passed through name.data() or std::string{name}. Not really a showstopper but still a small nuisance.
Would there be an interest in such a feature ?
Thanks
Apart for the required development effort, is there a technical reason not to support std::string_view names in the API ?
There is no implicit conversion from string_view to string which means that string_view names must be passed through name.data() or std::string{name}. Not really a showstopper but still a small nuisance.
Would there be an interest in such a feature ?
Thanks