ci: refresh config-equivalence expectations after #475 - #503
Merged
Merged
Conversation
godofecht
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2026
…r-475 ci: refresh config-equivalence expectations after #475
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes the currently red
FLOW syntax and importscheck.PR #475 intentionally aligned
KernelSVC_RBF/irismax_iterto 1000 on both sides, reducing the canonical rows with surviving configuration differences from 5 to 4.benchmarks/test_config_equivalence.pystill encoded the pre-#475 state, so the fixture failed even though the comparator and contract were correct.This updates only the fixture expectation and adds a comment pinning why the KernelSVC row is now expected to be clean. No runtime, benchmark, or parity policy is changed.