PB-2395: follow up cosmetic fixes - #minor - #183
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
changed the title
adk-swisstopo
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 9, 2026 15:11
adk-swisstopo
enabled auto-merge
September 9, 2026 15:12
asteiner-swisstopo
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2026
asteiner-swisstopo
left a comment
asteiner-swisstopo
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks!
Seems the blank lines between the items of the numbered list did not have any effect, that's just how VuePress looks like 🤷
I still don't like the "Third party libraries" section but I can live with it 😏
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I merged #182 before @asteiner-swisstopo completed his review. This addresses most of the points he raised there.
It does not address the comment about removing or updating the wording of "third party libraries" section. I sort of like it as is. But you are welcome to send your own PR if you think it's important.
Test link