CIP: Penalty Cap Redesign

[fhenneke]

Documentation change reflecting the penalty cap redesign CIP draft: the chain-specific absolute penalty cap is replaced by a per-order penalty cap.

This PR would be merged, after filling in the CIP-XX placeholders, if the CIP were to pass.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated solver rewards documentation to include CIP-XX guidance.
  • Clarified performance reward caps, including chain-specific upper limits and lower limits based on unsettled orders.
  • Documented per-order penalty caps using quote value, a global 20 USD limit, fill fraction, and chain/token-pair basis points.
  • Expanded solver strategy guidance to explain how penalties are bounded.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
docs	Ready	Preview	Aug 11, 2026 9:32am

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@fhenneke, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 28 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: aeaf5dc7-e8eb-47a1-a055-47e52eb96f89

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df72f62 and 90ac742.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/cow-protocol/reference/core/auctions/rewards.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The solver rewards documentation references CIP-XX, updates chain-specific performance caps, defines lower caps from unsettled orders, and clarifies penalty guidance for late or absent settlement.

Changes

Solver rewards

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Reward caps and solver guidance docs/cow-protocol/reference/core/auctions/rewards.md	The introduction references CIP-XX. Upper caps use chain-specific β values. Lower caps use unsettled winning orders with quote-based, USD-equivalent, chain-specific, and token-pair-specific limits. Solver guidance refers to the relevant orders’ penalty caps.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• cowprotocol/docs#603: Updates the same solver-rewards documentation and related CIP-XX terminology.

Suggested reviewers: architsharma7, harisang

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main documentation change: redesigning the penalty cap.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the purpose, key change, and CIP placeholder condition, although it omits the template headings and checklist.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/penalty-cap-redesign

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 4

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/cow-protocol/reference/core/auctions/rewards.md`:
- Line 155: Update the solver guidance paragraph to replace “revert risk” with
“settlement-failure risk,” ensuring the reported-score adjustment explicitly
covers both late and absent settlement cases represented by the penalty caps.
- Line 44: Update the user-facing definition near the upper cap c_u to replace
“onchain” with “on-chain,” leaving the rest of the sentence unchanged.
- Around line 51-55: Update the definition of c_l in the rewards documentation
to explicitly define unsettled_i as the winning auction-order pairs from solver
i’s solutions that were not fully settled. Specify that each pair contributes
its penalty cap for the unexecuted portion, including the appropriate
partial-fill accounting, rather than treating only entirely unsettled orders as
contributors.
- Around line 59-65: Update the penalty-cap definition near
\textrm{penaltyCap}_o to remove the claim that \bar{c} equals the native-token
equivalent of 20 USD. Describe \bar{c} using the chain-specific lower-cap values
and terminology established by the actual CIP or implementation contract,
without introducing a price source or rounding rule.

🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27cfbc0-0ab7-476c-a86a-9bed96b891f0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5c361d and 244e6cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/cow-protocol/reference/core/auctions/rewards.md