feat(sdk-kotlin): mark protobuf event format support in Kotlin column - #1395
Merged
duglin merged 1 commit intoSep 3, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Octavio Calleya Garcia <octavio@transgressoft.net>
jskeet
approved these changes
Sep 3, 2026
Member
|
LGTM, verification error is unrelated |
Collaborator
|
@jskeet @erikerikson thanks! Merging |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Kotlin SDK now implements the CloudEvents protobuf event format (
:cloudevents-kotlin-protobuf).What changed
spec_version= 0.3, v0.3 attributes ride the attributes map — matching the reference sdk-java implementation)The claim is backed by conformance tests: vendored sdk-java fixture vectors serialized with the canonical google reference implementation (protoc + protobuf-java-util), hand-computed golden wire bytes, and semantic round-trip suites.
Related: the JSON format support row was merged previously (PR #1394).