Skip to content

chore(deps): update actions/attest-build-provenance action to v4 - #86

Open
cachekit-renovate-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/actions-attest-build-provenance-4.x
Open

cachekit-renovate-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/actions-attest-build-provenance-4.x

Conversation

@cachekit-renovate-bot

@cachekit-renovate-bot cachekit-renovate-bot Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
actions/attest-build-provenance action major v2 → v4

Release Notes

actions/attest-build-provenance (actions/attest-build-provenance)

v4.2.2

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
As of version 4, actions/attest-build-provenance is simply a wrapper on top of actions/attest.

Existing applications may continue to use the attest-build-provenance action, but new implementations should use actions/attest instead.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/attest-build-provenance@v4.1.1...v4.2.2

v4.1.1

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
As of version 4, actions/attest-build-provenance is simply a wrapper on top of actions/attest.

Existing applications may continue to use the attest-build-provenance action, but new implementations should use actions/attest instead.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/attest-build-provenance@v4.1.0...v4.1.1

v4.1.0

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
As of version 4, actions/attest-build-provenance is simply a wrapper on top of actions/attest.

Existing applications may continue to use the attest-build-provenance action, but new implementations should use actions/attest instead.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/attest-build-provenance@v4.0.0...v4.1.0

v4.0.0

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
As of version 4, actions/attest-build-provenance is simply a wrapper on top of actions/attest.

Existing applications may continue to use the attest-build-provenance action, but new implementations should use actions/attest instead.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/attest-build-provenance@v3.2.0...v4.0.0

v4

Compare Source

v3.2.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: actions/attest-build-provenance@v3.1.0...v3.2.0

v3.1.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: actions/attest-build-provenance@v3...v3.1.0

v3.0.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

⚠️ Minimum Compatible Runner Version

v2.327.1
Release Notes

Make sure your runner is updated to this version or newer to use this release.

Full Changelog: actions/attest-build-provenance@v2.4.0...v3.0.0

v3

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Australia/Sydney)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 6am"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@cachekit-renovate-bot cachekit-renovate-bot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file major labels Sep 29, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: cachekit-io/cachekit-core/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: ec9a05a0-e632-48ec-92bc-539d4c3a9905

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kodus-27b

kodus-27b Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review Completed! 🔥

The code review was successfully completed based on your current configurations.

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the `@kody start-review` command at the root of your PR.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Providing Context (Files & MCPs)

Add these hints in your PR description (or a comment) to unlock deeper checks:

  • Ticket / Acceptance Criteria: `Refs: ABC-123` (Linear/Jira/Asana/ClickUp/Trello) or a direct ticket link.
  • Bugfix Validation: a Sentry/Datadog/Bugsnag event link (or paste the stack trace/error message).
  • Endpoint Risk: mention the route (e.g., `POST /api/payments`) or controller/action name.
  • Attach a repo file as context: use an explicit marker like `@file:docs/guide.mdx#L10-L50` (replace with your real path).
  • API Contract Docs: include `@file:openapi.yaml` or `@file:swagger.json` when changing routes/schemas.
  • Definition of Done / Standards: include `@file:DOD.md` or `@file:CONTRIBUTING.md` if your repo has them.
  • Design System Source of Truth: include `@file:ui/index.ts` (replace with your DS entrypoint path).
  • Feature Flags: include the flag key/name and `@file:flags.ts` / `@file:config.json` (and optionally the PostHog flag name).
  • Edge/CDN Rules: link the Cloudflare rule/zone or describe the intended redirect/header behavior.
  • Attach an MCP tool output: use `@mcp<provider|tool>` (replace with an installed MCP provider + tool, e.g., `@mcp<sentry|events.search>`).
Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Bug ✅
Performance ✅
Security ✅
Business Logic ✅

Access your configuration settings here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file major

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant