Skip to content

[SECURITY] Fix four externally reachable security findings - #174

Closed
davidindra wants to merge 4 commits into
bitbound:mainfrom
davidindra:security-fixes
Closed

davidindra wants to merge 4 commits into
bitbound:mainfrom
davidindra:security-fixes

Conversation

@davidindra

@davidindra davidindra commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Fixes the four highest-rated findings from an external-perimeter security review of the server: two rated High and two Medium. All four are reachable from the internet without a foothold or an insider.

  • Emailed account links were built from the request Host header (CVSS 8.1). Submitting the forgot-password form with a victim's email and a forged Host produced a genuine email from the real server containing a valid reset token pointing at the attacker's origin. AllowedHosts ships as *, so nothing rejected the forged value.
  • A device with no stored public key could be taken over on the agent hub (CVSS 8.1). AgentHub carries no [Authorize]. The deprecated unsigned UpdateDevice accepted such a device outright, and UpdateDeviceSigned verified the signature against the key the caller supplied in the same message. Either path rewrote ConnectionId — the field that routes viewer commands — and adopted the caller's key permanently.
  • The self-bootstrap single-tenant restriction was bypassable (CVSS 6.5). It only ran when the caller left TenantId empty, so naming an existing tenant explicitly skipped it.
  • Relay access tokens were compared with == (CVSS 6.8, partial fix). The responder half of a relay session is unauthenticated, so that token is the only check on that side.

Behaviour changes worth a reviewer's attention

  • IAgentHub.UpdateDevice is removed. Current agents only call UpdateDeviceSigned, so they are unaffected. Agents predating signed updates will fail to connect and must re-register.
  • A device row whose PublicKey is empty can no longer update over the hub. It must be re-registered through the installer-key API to adopt a key. Worth counting before rollout: SELECT count(*) FROM "Devices" WHERE "PublicKey" IS NULL OR "PublicKey" = '';
  • Under self-bootstrap, the tenant now comes from the server, not the caller. An agent can no longer choose which tenant it lands in, which is what the single-tenant restriction always intended.
  • No default changes. With PublicBaseUrl unset, link generation behaves exactly as before.

Change List

F-01 — emailed links no longer derive from the request (c231966)

  • Added AppOptions.PublicBaseUrl: the absolute base URL the server is reachable at.
  • Added IPublicUrlProvider / PublicUrlProvider (ControlR.Web.Server/Services/), registered scoped. It returns the configured base URL when one is set and falls back to the request only when it is not.
  • Rewired all five sites that build a link for an outgoing email, not just the one in the finding: ForgotPassword.razor, ResendEmailConfirmation.razor, both sites in Manage/Email.razor, and the fallback in UserCreator.
  • In UserCreator, the configured base URL now takes precedence over the caller-supplied confirmationBaseUrl, because IdentityApiRegisterFilter derives that one from Request.Scheme + Request.Host.
  • Production startup warns when neither PublicBaseUrl nor AllowedHosts is pinned, following the existing Data Protection warning pattern.
  • Documented ControlR_AppOptions__PublicBaseUrl and ControlR_AllowedHosts in both compose files; added PublicBaseUrl to appsettings.json.

F-02 — device takeover on the agent hub (4fed504)

  • Removed the deprecated unsigned UpdateDevice from AgentHub and from the IAgentHub contract.
  • UpdateDeviceSigned now trusts a caller-supplied public key only to bootstrap a device the server has never seen. An existing device with no stored key is rejected rather than re-keyed; adoption goes through the installer-key-authenticated registration API.
  • DecommissionServerTests migrated to the signed path; CreateTestDevice gained an optional publicKeyBase64 parameter.

F-03 — self-bootstrap tenant restriction (02ac81b)

  • The single-tenant check now runs whenever self-bootstrap is the authority for the write, instead of only when TenantId was left empty, and the tenant is read from the server rather than the request.

F-04 — relay access token comparison (4c86806)

  • SessionSignaler.ValidateToken uses CryptographicOperations.FixedTimeEquals.
  • Partial by design. Two gaps from the finding are not addressed here: the requester still has no authorization policy beyond IsAuthenticated (a tenant- or device-scoped check is not expressible through IAuthorizationService.AuthorizeAsync(user, policyName) without a resource), and the session is still created by whichever peer connects first. Both need a wider change across ViewerHub and the clients, and are better done with a working test loop.

Accept CLA

You must accept the below CLA in order for your PR to be considered. You can read more about CLAs here.

  • By checking this box, you agree to the a below Contributor License Agreement.

Contribution License Agreement

This Contribution License Agreement ("Agreement") is agreed to by the party signing below ("You"), and conveys certain license rights to Jared Goodwin ("Original Author") for Your contributions to the ControlR project in this repository. This Agreement is effective as of your the latest PR submission.

  1. Definitions.

"Code" means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form, that is delivered by You to Original Author under this Agreement.

"Project" means any of the projects owned or managed by Original Author in which software is offered under a license approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI) (www.opensource.org) and documentation offered under an OSI or a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses).

"Submit" is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by You as "Not a Submission."

"Submission" means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any associated comments and documentation.

  1. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.

  2. Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work. Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase "Submission containing materials of a third party:" followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project's written guidelines concerning Submissions.

  3. Your Employer. References to "employer" in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term "You" in this Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.

  4. Licenses.

    a. Copyright License. You grant Original Author, and those who receive the Submission directly or indirectly from Original Author, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third parties.

    b. Patent License. You grant Original Author, and those who receive the Submission directly or indirectly from Original Author, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.

    c. Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement. No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.

  5. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement. You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

  6. Notice to Original Author. You agree to notify Original Author in writing of any facts or circumstances of which You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any respect.

  7. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other information that You submit with Your Submission.

  8. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County, Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.

  9. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Original Author.

By checking the above acceptance box, You accept and agree to the terms of this Contribution License Agreement for Your present and future Submissions to Original Author.

Password reset, email confirmation and email change links were built from the
incoming request, so a forged Host header produced a genuine email carrying a
valid token that pointed at the attacker's origin.

Adds AppOptions.PublicBaseUrl and an IPublicUrlProvider that all five emailed
link sites now use. It takes precedence over the request-derived base the
registration filter passes in. Unset, behaviour is unchanged, and production
startup warns when neither PublicBaseUrl nor AllowedHosts is pinned.
AgentHub has no [Authorize], so a device whose stored PublicKey was empty
could be claimed by any anonymous caller that knew its id: the deprecated
unsigned UpdateDevice accepted it outright, and UpdateDeviceSigned verified
the signature against the key the caller supplied in the same message. Either
rewrote ConnectionId, which routes viewer commands, and adopted the caller's
key permanently.

Removes UpdateDevice from the hub and IAgentHub, and restricts a caller-
supplied key to bootstrapping a device the server has never seen. Re-keying
an existing device now goes through the installer-key registration API.

Current agents only call UpdateDeviceSigned; agents predating it will need to
re-register. Decommission tests move to the signed path.
The check only ran when the caller left TenantId empty, so naming an existing
tenant explicitly skipped it and self-bootstrap accepted a chosen tenant on a
multi-tenant server.

It now runs whenever self-bootstrap is the authority for the write, and the
tenant is taken from the server rather than the caller.
SessionSignaler used an ordinary string comparison, which short-circuits on
the first differing byte. The responder half of a relay session is
unauthenticated, so this token is the only check on that side.

Does not address the other two gaps in the finding: the requester still has
no authorization policy beyond being authenticated, and the session is still
created by whichever peer connects first.
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you so much for your interest in ControlR! I really appreciate you taking the time to contribute.

However, I am not accepting PRs at the moment for the following reasons:

Legal and Financial Considerations
With Remotely, I found out that there are legal impliciations to accepting external contributions. Once I have a Contributor's License Agreement (CLA) in place, I want to have an attorney review everything to make sure I'm not missing anything.

Foundational Changes
During these early stages of the project, there will be (and have already been) large foundational changes. I'll be able to move quicker and maintain a clear vision during this period if I'm not having to coordinate with distributed changes.

Reviewing AI Code
With the rise of AI, I'm worried that I'd spend the vast majority of my time reviewing AI-generated PRs, which would detract from my ability to keep the project moving forward. I don't know yet how I'm going to handle this issue, but I don't currently have the bandwidth to find solutions.

I will begin accepting external contributions once ControlR reaches a more mature state and I've been able to resolve the above concerns. Thank you for understanding!

If you have ideas, suggestions, or found a bug, please feel free to open an issue instead. I'd love to hear your feedback!

Thank you again for your interest in the project! 🙏

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Sep 21, 2026
@davidindra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

CLA agreement checkbox ticked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant