chore(ack-pay): review polish follow-up for #120

[EfeDurmaz16]

Summary

Follow-up for the two Small / Optional polish notes on #120, kept out of that PR since it was already approved:

• Move schemas.test.ts to packages/ack-pay/src/schemas/schemas.test.ts next to the schemas it tests, imports now ./valibot and ./zod (repo rule: tests co-located with source)
• Reword the changeset so it no longer names timestampSchema, which is not an exported symbol consumers could find

Now that #120 has merged, this is rebased onto main and the diff is the single chore(ack-pay) commit: 2 files, +5/-6.

Verification

• pnpm run check (build + format + type-aware lint + test) all green after the rebase
• pnpm --filter ./packages/ack-pay test 36 passing from the new location

AI Usage Disclosure

This contribution was AI-assisted using Claude Code. AI assistance was used to apply the two review suggestions and run verification. I reviewed the final diff and take responsibility for the submitted changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Clarified that payment request validation checks whether dates are parseable before converting them to ISO format.

• Tests

  • Updated schema test references to use the current module locations, ensuring validation tests continue to run correctly.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ac04a18d-1461-414e-b1c3-35c09de8db57

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2233047 and ea51d8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .changeset/dedupe-timestamp-schema.md
• packages/ack-pay/src/schemas/schemas.test.ts

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

The changeset now attributes date validation to paymentRequestSchema. Schema tests now use the current Valibot and Zod import paths.

Changes

Schema documentation and test imports

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Align schema documentation and test imports .changeset/dedupe-timestamp-schema.md, packages/ack-pay/src/schemas/schemas.test.ts	The changeset documents validation before ISO normalization. Tests import paymentRequestSchema from ./valibot and ./zod.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ea51d

This PR only relocates co-located tests and clarifies release-note wording; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after the reported checks pass.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately identifies this as an ack-pay maintenance follow-up for issue #120. It matches the documented review-polish changes.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.