⚡ Optimize Bellman-Ford queue membership checks - #133
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
⚡ Performance Optimization: Bellman-Ford Queue Membership
💡 What
Modified
BellmanFordModel.javato use aboolean[][] inQueuearray for tracking which cells are currently in the queue, instead of using aSet<GridCell>.🎯 Why
The codebase had an anti-pattern where queue membership was being tracked using a
Set<GridCell> inQueue = new HashSet<>();. WhileHashSet.contains()is typically O(1), it comes with hashing calculation overhead and worse cache locality compared to a simple primitive boolean array grid matching the grid size.Using a
boolean[][]array bounded by the known rows and cols of the grid eliminates hashing overhead entirely and provides lightning-fast strictly O(1) reads/writes.📊 Measured Improvement
I benchmarked the algorithm using a large 1000x1000 empty grid where we trace from top-left
[0,0]to bottom-right[999,999].Results (10 iteration average):
Change: The queue membership optimization yielded a ~67.7% reduction in execution time for the Bellman-Ford algorithm on large grids, making it more than 3x faster.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 14414199815115699901 started by @Sanan507