Skip to content

PTB exposure accounting filter (run 2A) - #955

Draft
fjnicolas wants to merge 4 commits into
developfrom
feature/fnicolas_potptbfilter
Draft

PTB exposure accounting filter (run 2A)#955
fjnicolas wants to merge 4 commits into
developfrom
feature/fnicolas_potptbfilter

Conversation

@fjnicolas

@fjnicolas fjnicolas commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

  • Adding art module to filter out BNBLight events with corrupted exposure accounting information (run 2 A). More details in docdb45634).
  • Adding dedicated run_decoder_job fhicls including the PTB filter. They are meant to be run only for the production campaign for Run2A.
  • Filter validation plots in docdb-??? (plots to come)

$${\color{blue}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

$${\color{blue}\bf{\textrm{IMPORTANT UPDATE Feb 2nd 2026:}}}$$ If you are making a PR which is intended as a patch for the CURRENT production for gen 2 SBND analyses, you must make two PRs: one for develop and one for the production/sbnd-gen2 branch.

$${\color{blue}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

Checklist

  • Added at least 1 label from available labels.
  • Assigned at least 1 reviewer under Reviewers,
  • Assigned all contributers including yourself under Assignees
  • Linked any relevant issues under Developement
  • Does this PR affect CAF data format? If so, please assign a CAF maintainer (PetrilloAtWork or JosiePaton) as additional reviewer.
  • Does this affect the standard workflow?
  • Is this PR a patch for the ongoing production? If so, separate PR must also be made for production/v10_06_00 branch!

Relevant PR links (optional)

Does this PR require merging another PR in a different repository (such as sbnanobj/sbnobj etc.)?

Link(s) to docdb describing changes (optional)

Is there a docdb describing the issue this solves or the feature added?

@fjnicolas fjnicolas self-assigned this Aug 14, 2026
@fjnicolas
fjnicolas requested a review from lyates17 August 14, 2026 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant