[TEST] TC-6192 verify-pr E2E acceptance vehicle

[mrizzi]

Throwaway PR to exercise the CI-gated verify-pr dispatch end-to-end (TC-6192).

The qualifying Jira task carries the ai-generated-jira label, is in Review, and points its Git Pull Request field at this PR. Used to confirm: dispatch waits for CI, verify-pr runs after CI finishes (pass and fail), report posts to PR + Jira, and no duplicate reports on re-run.

Safe to close/delete after TC-6192.

Implements TC-6192

Summary by Sourcery

Add temporary TC-6192 acceptance scaffolding to exercise verify-pr dispatch and reporting after CI failure.

Documentation:

• Add documentation identifying the temporary TC-6192 end-to-end acceptance vehicle.

Tests:

• Add temporary acceptance-test scaffolding covering verify-pr behavior when CI fails.

Chores:

• Add disposable scaffolding for the TC-6192 verify-pr end-to-end acceptance exercise.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This throwaway PR adds a six-line E2E acceptance-test document used as the vehicle for validating CI-gated verify-pr dispatch, including successful and failed CI paths, PR/Jira reporting, and duplicate-report prevention on reruns; it contains no production code or workflow changes.

Sequence diagram for CI-gated verify-pr acceptance flow

sequenceDiagram
    actor Maintainer
    participant Jira
    participant PR
    participant CI
    participant VerifyPR

    Maintainer->>Jira: Qualify task
    Jira->>PR: Link Git Pull Request
    PR->>CI: Run CI
    CI-->>PR: CI finishes
    PR->>VerifyPR: Dispatch verify-pr
    VerifyPR->>PR: Post report
    VerifyPR->>Jira: Post report
    Maintainer->>VerifyPR: Re-run verify-pr
    VerifyPR-->>PR: Avoid duplicate report
    VerifyPR-->>Jira: Avoid duplicate report

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Adds a disposable documentation marker for the TC-6192 verify-pr end-to-end acceptance workflow.	Documents the qualifying PR-to-CI-to-verify-pr reporting flow. Marks the file and associated PR as safe to remove after acceptance testing.	docs/e2e/tc-6192-vehicle.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Sourcery assessment

Approved.

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Verify Pr · ⏭️ Skipped (no Jira issue links PR #300 in its Git Pull Request field) · Started 3:41 PM UTC · Completed 3:41 PM UTC

Commit: 4c1b71d · View workflow run →

Effort: high

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Verify Pr · ✅ Success · Started 3:46 PM UTC · Completed 3:54 PM UTC

Commit: 3271577 · View workflow run →

Runtime: claude · Model: claude-opus-4-8 · Effort: high · Cost: $3.10

[fullsend-ai-review]

Verification Report for TC-6254 (commit 3271577)

Check	Result	Details
Review Feedback	N/A	No inline review comments and no substantive review-body feedback (sole review is a sourcery-ai approval).
Root-Cause Investigation	N/A	No sub-tasks created; nothing to investigate.
Scope Containment	PASS	Created file docs/e2e/tc-6192-vehicle.md matches the file named in the acceptance criterion; no out-of-scope or unimplemented files.
Diff Size	PASS	1 file, 6 insertions, 0 deletions — proportionate for a doc-scaffolding task.
Commit Traceability	WARN	1 of 2 commits references TC-6254; both carry an Implements TC-6192 trailer (sibling umbrella task).
Sensitive Patterns	PASS	No secrets, keys, or credentials in added lines.
CI Status	PASS	No CI failures evident; verify-pr dispatch fired post-CI-gate (direct CI polling unavailable in sandbox).
Acceptance Criteria	PASS	1 of 1 criteria met — the note exists and states it is safe to delete after TC-6192.
Test Quality	N/A	No test files in the PR; Eval Quality: N/A (no eval result reviews).
Test Change Classification	N/A	No test files added, modified, or deleted.
Verification Commands	N/A	No verification commands specified and no eval infrastructure changes.

Overall: WARN

Overall WARN — the only non-PASS check is Commit Traceability: commit 4c1b71d references only the sibling umbrella task TC-6192 (Implements TC-6192) and not this task TC-6254, while commit 3271577 mentions both. This is informational and does not block. The PR otherwise satisfies its single acceptance criterion, contains no secrets, and shows no CI failures. No code change requests were raised, so no sub-tasks were created. Merging remains a human decision.

---

This comment was AI-generated by sdlc-workflow/verify-pr v0.13.9.

Sourcery withdrew this approval because the latest commits introduced blocking findings.

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Verify Pr · ✅ Success · Started 3:58 PM UTC · Completed 4:08 PM UTC

Commit: 64b818c · View workflow run →

Runtime: claude · Model: claude-opus-4-8 · Effort: high · Cost: $4.33

[fullsend-ai-review]

Verification Report for TC-6254 (commit 64b818c)

Check	Result	Details
Review Feedback	N/A	No inline review comments and no substantive review-body feedback (sole review is a sourcery-ai[bot] approval).
Root-Cause Investigation	N/A	No new sub-tasks created this run (the sole CI failure is already tracked by existing sub-task TC-6255); nothing to investigate.
Scope Containment	WARN	Task-required file docs/e2e/tc-6192-vehicle.md present; one justified out-of-scope test file (test_tc6192_ci_fail.py) added to exercise the CI-fail path.
Diff Size	PASS	17 insertions across 2 files — proportionate to a scaffolding task.
Commit Traceability	WARN	Only 1 of 3 commits references task ID TC-6254; the other two reference the parent TC-6192.
Sensitive Patterns	PASS	No sensitive patterns detected in 17 added lines across 2 files.
CI Status	FAIL	python-tests check failed on the intentional assert False test (deliberate CI-fail acceptance scenario; already tracked by TC-6255).
Acceptance Criteria	PASS	1 of 1 criteria met — docs/e2e/tc-6192-vehicle.md exists with the required description and deletion note.
Test Quality	PASS	Repetitive tests: none; test doc comments present; Eval Quality: N/A.
Test Change Classification	ADDITIVE	One new test file added; no modified/deleted tests.
Verification Commands	N/A	No verification commands specified; PR touches no eval infrastructure.

Overall: FAIL

The PR satisfies its single acceptance criterion (the docs/e2e/tc-6192-vehicle.md note describing the throwaway acceptance vehicle and stating it is safe to delete after TC-6192), contains no secrets, and adds test coverage additively. Overall is FAIL solely because the python-tests CI check fails — by design: this throwaway E2E vehicle deliberately adds an always-failing test (test_tc6192_intentional_failure) to exercise verify-pr's post-CI-failure dispatch (CI result is data, not a gate for this vehicle). That failure is already tracked by sub-task TC-6255 (created on a prior verify-pr run for this same commit), so no new sub-task was created this run. Two informational WARNs: Scope Containment includes one justified out-of-scope test file, and Commit Traceability references the parent TC-6192 rather than TC-6254 in 2 of 3 commits. This skill does not merge or transition the issue — a human reviewer decides on merge; the vehicle files are safe to delete after TC-6192.

---

This comment was AI-generated by sdlc-workflow/verify-pr v0.13.9.

Previous run

Verification Report for TC-6254 (commit 64b818c)

Check	Result	Details
Review Feedback	N/A	No inline review comments; the sole review is a sourcery-ai[bot] approval with no substantive feedback.
Root-Cause Investigation	SKIPPED	1 CI-failure sub-task created, but the failure is intentional E2E throwaway scaffolding — no preventable workflow-phase or convention gap, so no root-cause task was created.
Scope Containment	WARN	Required file docs/e2e/tc-6192-vehicle.md present; one extra file plugins/sdlc-workflow/scripts/test_tc6192_ci_fail.py is justified CI-fail scaffolding.
Diff Size	PASS	2 files, +17/-0 — proportional to a throwaway docs + scaffolding task.
Commit Traceability	WARN	1 of 3 commits references TC-6254; the other two reference TC-6192 (parent E2E effort).
Sensitive Patterns	PASS	No secrets, credentials, keys, or sensitive files in any added line.
CI Status	FAIL	python-tests fails: test_tc6192_intentional_failure in test_tc6192_ci_fail.py does assert False (intentional).
Acceptance Criteria	PASS	1 of 1 criteria met — docs/e2e/tc-6192-vehicle.md describes the throwaway vehicle and states it is safe to delete after TC-6192.
Test Quality	PASS	Repetitive Test PASS; Test Documentation PASS (module + function docstrings); Eval Quality: N/A.
Test Change Classification	ADDITIVE	Only a new test file added; no test coverage removed or weakened.
Verification Commands	N/A	No task-specified verification commands and no eval infrastructure changes detected.

Overall: FAIL

CI Status is FAIL: PR #300 introduces test_tc6192_ci_fail.py whose test_tc6192_intentional_failure always fails, driving the python-tests check to a failure conclusion by design (this is a TC-6192 E2E acceptance vehicle demonstrating that verify-pr still runs and posts despite CI failure — CI result is data, not a gate). A CI-failure sub-task was created to track removing the throwaway test. Scope Containment and Commit Traceability are WARN (justified extra scaffolding file; commits reference TC-6192 rather than TC-6254). Root-Cause Investigation was SKIPPED — the failure is intentional, self-documented scaffolding with no preventable systemic gap. All other checks PASS or N/A. Merging remains a human decision; this report is informational.

---

This comment was AI-generated by sdlc-workflow/verify-pr v0.13.9.

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Verify Pr · ✅ Success · Started 4:12 PM UTC · Completed 4:21 PM UTC

Commit: 64b818c · View workflow run →

Runtime: claude · Model: claude-opus-4-8 · Effort: high · Cost: $3.97

[mrizzi]

Closing — this was the disposable E2E acceptance vehicle for TC-6192. The run evidence is permanent (workflow run IDs + these report comments persist) and is recorded in fullsend.md via PR #301. Safe to close and delete the branch.