Skip to content

PMM-15475 Feature build - #4561

Draft
ondrejpatocka wants to merge 4 commits into
v3from
PMM-15475-telemetry-kubernetes-signal
Draft

PMM-15475 Feature build#4561
ondrejpatocka wants to merge 4 commits into
v3from
PMM-15475-telemetry-kubernetes-signal

Conversation

@ondrejpatocka

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Feature build for the PMM-15475 telemetry Kubernetes datapoints, so QA has a server image to verify against.

Component PRs

ci.yml

deps:
  - name: pmm
    branch: PMM-15475-telemetry-kubernetes-signal
    url: https://github.com/percona/pmm

Single repo — only percona/pmm is pinned; every other dependency stays at its default.

What QA needs to know

The change adds two telemetry presence flags, pmm_server_installed_with_helm and pmm_server_in_kubernetes, which distinguish a PMM Server on Kubernetes from one under Docker. Test instructions are on PMM-15475.

This is a feature build, so pmm-managed will build and log the telemetry report but never send it — sending is skipped for non-release versions. QA verifies from /srv/logs/pmm-managed.log with PMM_DEBUG=1, not from the Percona portal.

Draft on purpose: to be closed, not merged, once the component PR lands.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Build PMM Server from percona/pmm PMM-15475-telemetry-kubernetes-signal so
QA can verify the pmm_server_installed_with_helm and pmm_server_in_kubernetes
telemetry datapoints against a real Kubernetes deployment.

Component PR: percona/pmm#5905

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Patocka <80347071+ondrejpatocka@users.noreply.github.com>
@JNKPercona

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Looks like there are outdated source branches.
Please update them and restart the job
percona/pmm#5905

@Percona-Lab Percona-Lab deleted a comment from JNKPercona Sep 10, 2026
@JNKPercona

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@JNKPercona

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

API tests have succeded: https://pmm.cd.percona.com/job/pmm3-api-tests/7331/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants