Preserve scoped authorization across agent handoffs - #39
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: HLLMR <github@dah.mm.st>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Linked issue
Closes #35
What changed
Preserve scoped Owner authorization across General and Operator handoffs without inventing new authority or repeatedly asking for the same decision.
This updates public main through a PR; it does not change the existing immutable v0.11.0 release, create a new release, or implement issues #36–38.
Evidence
3d92f1b9b6fe3dd262f01d31f2bd08128c028f5fe31e5cdd173a3098fce42920.The accepted bounded role-play covered ten scenarios. This is behavioral evidence, not mechanical enforcement, proof of universal provider compliance, or measured reduction in Owner effort.
Retained publication diagnostics
The first test wrapper omitted the explicit test directory and ran zero tests; it was rejected and corrected. An initial build lacked source identity because of a post-reinstall Git ownership mismatch. That candidate was superseded by two rebuilt candidates with exact source provenance, and both full native gates were repeated on the corrected bytes. The reviewer withdrew an incorrect interpretation that unavailable source identity was intentional. No checker or implementation was weakened.
Local privacy screening used the documented machine-path-only profile. It does not certify optional private identifiers absent from that profile; positive allowlisting and the fresh public review remain separate controls.
Review boundary
Owner authorized opening this PR, not merging it or releasing. Issue #35 remains open until an authorized merge.