fix(admin): A2A card hint — per-source ✓/○ status (CLEAN-95) - #88
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…hing (CLEAN-95) A card with a description but no skills was still headlined 'advertises nothing' while the description sat right above the banner — and the claim 'never by topic' was wrong: matching runs on the description too (the T037 prod run proved it). The hint now shows ✓/○ per source (description / template skills / knowledge) with what is set marked green, and the Row and picker warnings say 'no skills — matching leans on its description alone' when a description exists. Bumps 0.3.53. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Review feedback on the shipped A2A tab: with a description set but no skills, the hint claimed the card 'advertises nothing' right under the visible description — and 'never by topic' was factually wrong (matching runs on the description; T037 proved it live).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code