-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Board hygiene for merged #936 — W5 v1's three verdicts superseded same day #937
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -54,6 +54,77 @@ | |
| **Status:** MERGED (`e6e27829`). Branch `claude/jirak-math-theorems-harvest-rfii13` | ||
| → `main`. Doc/plan/board only. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 2026-08-12 — lance-graph #936 (MERGED) — W5 v1 RUN: B2 PASS / B3 VOID / B4 smooth, and codex found all three verdicts were built on sand (v2 fix in flight, not yet landed) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reviewed commit's parent is merge Useful? React with 👍 / 👎. |
||
|
|
||
| - **Added.** `spiral_adi_probe.json` — v1's headline (N=3·F(17)²=7 651 227) | ||
| + B4 sweep result — plus `E-ON-A-GOLDEN-LATTICE-LOCALITY-IS-FIBONACCI-MEMBERSHIP-1` | ||
| (the epiphany that a local non-Fibonacci control on a Vogel lattice does | ||
| not exist, per the three-distance theorem). | ||
| - **⊘ SUPERSEDED — this PR's own verdicts, corrected the same day.** Codex | ||
| review on #936 found FOUR real defects, each striking at a different | ||
| verdict: (1) **B3's control was subsampled** at 250k/band against | ||
| ~956k-point headline bands — ~74 % of sources got no real tree and | ||
| silently self-linked, so the reported ratio 0.9996 measured mostly | ||
| self-links, not the control — **the VOID verdict, and the epiphany's own | ||
| 99.38 % Fibonacci-membership figure that grounded it, rest on an | ||
| unverified headline number** (the 99.38 % measurement itself was taken | ||
| at a SUB-cap N and remains valid; only the HEADLINE ratio was | ||
| compromised). (2) **B2's iso-fit search floor equalled the input σ** — | ||
| an inert operator (v1's fixed 8 iterations added ~0.003 % variance at | ||
| N=7.65M) fits `sigma_ref=sigma` exactly, indistinguishable from a | ||
| resolved diffusion — **the PASS verdict never demonstrated diffusion | ||
| occurred.** (3) **The bump sat only 1.72σ from the qualifying-band mask | ||
| edge** — analytically, a one-sided Gaussian truncation there produces a | ||
| covariance ratio of 1.2082, matching the measured "asymptote" of 1.213 | ||
| closely — **the reported ~21 % structural anisotropy residual is | ||
| plausibly the MASK, not the ADI operator.** (4) The 99.38 % figure lived | ||
| only in chat/board prose, not in a committed, reproducible artifact. | ||
| - **Fixed, same day, pre-registered BEFORE the v2 run — the CODE, and it | ||
| landed IN #936, not in a follow-up** (`106ca605` is an ancestor of | ||
| `a3f627f3`, verified via `git merge-base --is-ancestor`; corrects an | ||
| overclaim in this entry's first draft, caught by codex P2 on PR #937 — | ||
| "landing in a follow-up PR" described the RUN's results, not the fix | ||
| itself, and read as if the fix were still pending when it was already | ||
| merged): full-band control (no cap; verified in-qualifying self-link | ||
| rate 0.27 % at the real headline N — a live debugging trap caught and | ||
| explained en route: a FIRST v2 diagnostic divided by total N rather than | ||
| qualifying-band population and reported a spurious 38 % "self-linked", | ||
| predicted exactly from the qualifying/non-qualifying population split, | ||
| confirming it was the diagnostic that was wrong, not the control); | ||
| iterations scaled to a fixed target added variance | ||
| (`iters = round(2V/h²)`, h² the measured mesh spacing) with the fit | ||
| search centered on the predicted σ_ref, plus a raw pre-fit check against | ||
| the unsmoothed input; the bump moved to σ=0.05, r0=0.78 (≥3.35σ | ||
| clearance; analytic baseline ratio there ≈1.005) with the | ||
| unsmoothed-baseline anisotropy now computed through the identical mask | ||
| every run; the control-link offset histogram is now COMPUTED by the | ||
| script (codex P2 on #937, second catch: "now lands in the committed | ||
| JSON" was future-tense stated as present — the tracked | ||
| `spiral_adi_probe.json` at merge time is still the v1 result with no | ||
| histogram in it; the histogram artifact itself is committed only once | ||
| the v2 RUN completes and its JSON replaces v1's). Timing verified (not | ||
| guessed) before launching: ~33 min for the headline sweep loops alone. | ||
| - **Deferred.** The v2 RUN's RESULTS — in flight at merge time (the v2 | ||
| CODE already merged, per the correction above), landing in a follow-up | ||
| PR with corrected B2/B3/B4 verdicts AND the histogram artifact codex P2 | ||
| asked to see committed. n=19/21 are out of scope | ||
| for v2's B4 under the V-matched iteration scaling (mechanism stated: | ||
| iters grows roughly linearly with N at fixed physical blur target, | ||
| making n=19 orders of magnitude more expensive than v1's uniform | ||
| 8-iteration sweep ever cost — which is exactly why v1's n=19 number was | ||
| cheap AND uninformative). | ||
| - **Confidence.** LOW on this PR's own three verdicts (B2/B3/B4), as | ||
| established the same day by external review — recorded rather than left | ||
| standing. The three-distance-theorem MECHANISM in the epiphany | ||
| (locality ⟺ Fibonacci membership) is independent of the compromised | ||
| headline ratio and stands on the sub-cap verification alone; the | ||
| epiphany entry is not retracted, only its headline evidentiary anchor. | ||
|
|
||
| **Status:** MERGED (`a3f627f3`). Branch `claude/jirak-math-theorems-harvest-rfii13` | ||
| → `main`. This PR's v1 VERDICTS are superseded same-day (the v2 CODE fix | ||
| merged in this same PR, per the correction above); see the v2 RUN entry | ||
| once its results land. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 2026-08-12 — lance-graph #935 (MERGED) — the validation wave RUNS: T1–T4 + W2s-a executed, four more defects caught, one new epiphany | ||
|
|
||
| - **Added.** `golden_vs_tempered_probe.py`/`.json` (T1–T4 executed against | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The cited measurement reports only 99.38% Fibonacci offsets, so it directly leaves some local non-Fibonacci links and cannot establish the universal
locality ⟺ Fibonacci membershipassertion. A result from one control construction at one finite N also does not prove that every possible local control is impossible; preserving that mechanism as a settled finding can therefore misdirect subsequent experiment design before stronger proof or reproducible evidence exists.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.