Skip to content

board: arc entries for #1074 + #1075, batched (hygiene-only — chain terminates here) - #1076

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/board-arc-1074-1075
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

board: arc entries for #1074 + #1075, batched (hygiene-only — chain terminates here)#1076
AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/board-arc-1074-1075

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

@AdaWorldAPI AdaWorldAPI commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Discharges the merged-PR board obligation for both PRs: PR_ARC_INVENTORY prepends + the LATEST_STATE table row.

Batched deliberately. Each entry was owed by its own PR's commits — that's my miss, and CLAUDE.md names the retroactive-cleanup pattern as the anti-pattern. Since it's retroactive either way now, one combined entry beats two separate cleanups, and the arc reads as one coherent event rather than two half-events.

Per the termination clause this PR is hygiene-only and generates NO further obligations — no arc entry, no LATEST_STATE update for itself. The chain stops here.

What the entries record that a future session cannot re-derive

ISS-KANBAN-PLAN-EXIT-HAS-NO-NAMED-ROUTE — CLOSED. Evaluation's successors are [Commit, Plan, Prune]; advance() took the first non-Prune (always Commit), veto() took Prune, and nothing produced Plan. The documented revision exit had legal-edge status and no route.

Two items OPEN ON MAIN, flagged rather than silently fixed:

  1. F-MEP-0b still reads "covariance or precision." jc::ewa_sandwich_3d is explicit — "world-space covariance matrices Σ ∈ ℝ³ˣ³ … pushed forward to image-space", M_k = sqrt(Σ_k), consumer ndarray::hpc::splat3d. Precision would be a new quantity borrowing the algebra, not reuse of the EWA operator. The real open question is the bounded monotone trust → step-transform mapping.
  2. Σ → TrustTextureGateDecision in §0b/§4 conflicts with EWA scoped as attention/tension geometry.

Both misdirect W1 before it runs. Neither is a defect in the merged text's own terms — which is exactly why they need a follow-up PR rather than a session note that evaporates.

Two prior-art corrections, both against earlier claims of mine:

  • Stamp::disjoint is canonical for S4 pooling under KNOWN overlap; the PR Causality audit: type the causal edge, declare kernel effects — and withdraw the source registry as a falsified design #854 ruling is canonical for evidential independence not being established (event identity ≠ evidential-base membership ≠ source dependence; Stamp is lossy at 1 << (id % 64); causal_audit.rs:346 leaves independent_strength None for want of a dependence model). FusionReceipt::shared_roots is therefore CONJECTURE, not duplication.
  • stance_panel is not H₃ — four non-destructive readings of an existing state, not the construction of a larger horizon. The Grail survives and is unbuilt.

The next two plans and their gating, including the H₃ wording correction: parallax earns the first buyer for H₃; it does not define H₃.

Gates

regenerate-and-diff is the only relevant check (board files only, no crates/ touched). Supersession index regenerated in-commit.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_016b33swuXE23hKtqxsHu9p1


Generated by Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated project planning records for merged changes covering candidate fusion, counterfactual evaluation, and revision-based decision routing.
    • Documented evidence handling, falsifiers, validation status, and typed verdict outcomes.
    • Added plans for trust propagation experiments, safeguards, statistical evaluation, and future follow-up work.
    • Preserved clarifications regarding pooling, evidential independence, and stance presentation.

Discharges the merged-PR obligation for both: PR_ARC_INVENTORY prepends and
the LATEST_STATE table row. Batched deliberately -- the entries were owed by
each PR's own commits (my miss), so they are retroactive either way, and one
combined entry beats two separate retroactive cleanups. Per the termination
clause this PR is hygiene-only and generates NO further obligations; the
chain stops here.

Records what a future session needs and cannot re-derive:

- ISS-KANBAN-PLAN-EXIT-HAS-NO-NAMED-ROUTE is CLOSED (Plan was declared with
  semantics and reachable by no named primitive).
- Two items OPEN ON MAIN, flagged not fixed: F-MEP-0b still reads "covariance
  or precision" though jc owns the covariance semantic (the real open question
  is the bounded monotone trust->step-transform mapping), and the
  Sigma->TrustTexture->GateDecision path in 0b/4 conflicts with EWA scoped as
  attention geometry. Both misdirect W1 before it runs.
- The two prior-art corrections, both against my own earlier claims:
  Stamp::disjoint is canonical for S4 pooling under KNOWN overlap while the
  #854 ruling is canonical for independence NOT being established; and
  stance_panel is four non-destructive READINGS, not H3.
- The next two plans and their gating, incl. the H3 wording correction:
  parallax earns the FIRST buyer for H3, it does not define H3.

Supersession index regenerated.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 97f7ab1f-ad45-4784-87b0-0950f9cbd455

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69016d9 and 034e3ea.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .claude/board/LATEST_STATE.md
  • .claude/board/PR_ARC_INVENTORY.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR adds append-only board records for merged PRs #1074 and #1075. The records document the epistemic triptych, Plan routing, EWA trust propagation, corrections, open issues, and queued work.

Changes

Board arc documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Merged contract and board state record
.claude/board/PR_ARC_INVENTORY.md, .claude/board/LATEST_STATE.md
Documents the fusion, counterfactual, and revision contract; revision routing to Plan; evidence-root semantics; validation status; corrections; and follow-up work.
EWA trust-propagation plan
.claude/board/PR_ARC_INVENTORY.md
Documents the EWA candidate operator, preregistered statistical gates, graph-internal evidence restrictions, methodological defects, scope corrections, and open issues.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Suggested reviewers: claude

Poem

A rabbit records the board tonight

New arcs are tucked in neat and right
Fusion hops, revision follows
EWA maps its trust-filled hollows
Open questions wait in sight
And queued work springs toward the light


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2026 18:55
@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI merged commit de1d0c2 into main Aug 29, 2026
1 check was pending
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants