Skip to content

Question: QT licensing question #170

Description

@iyobo

I personally don't like QT licensing headaches and the complexities involved in them.

I would like to create a closed-source, potentially commercial node-gui desktop app and use this to pack the app in a manner such that it can hopefully satisfy QT's LGPL licensing limitations.

Can I simply trust that the result of this packer can be distributed to potential customers without thinking about QT "stuff" and licensing?

Or do I still have to send my users a link and have them install QT by themselves?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions