You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi everyone! I'm a contributor to OmniBOR (formerly GitBOM) and noticed an issue regarding a double negative in a sentence about patent rights in the foreword of the OmniBOR spec, and some searching showed the same issue appears in the SCIM spec as well.
The sentence "No party shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights." is found in the foreword and appears to be a possible transcription / editing error from the ISO template of the Rice model.
In the Rice model sample, it says: "ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights." You can view the PDF here (page 11).
Hi everyone! I'm a contributor to OmniBOR (formerly GitBOM) and noticed an issue regarding a double negative in a sentence about patent rights in the foreword of the OmniBOR spec, and some searching showed the same issue appears in the SCIM spec as well.
The sentence "No party shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights." is found in the foreword and appears to be a possible transcription / editing error from the ISO template of the Rice model.
In the Rice model sample, it says: "ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights." You can view the PDF here (page 11).
Related issue for OmniBOR: omnibor/spec#38