Old javax.mail:mail:1.4.7 & javax.activation:activation:1.1.1 didn't use to have module name, and would typically be called mail.jar & activiation.jar, and have module names mail & activiation.
Uptodate com.sun.mail:javax.mail:1.6.2 & com.sun.activation:javax.activation:1.2.0 have module names java.mail and java.activation.
The bcmail-fips-2.0.5 didn't used to have "mail" and "activation" requirements.
The new bcmail-fips-2.0.7 & bcmail-fips-2.1.7 require "mail" and "activation" should they instead require java.mail & java.activation? and should pom.xml be updated on maven central to automatically pull in those deps?
Old javax.mail:mail:1.4.7 & javax.activation:activation:1.1.1 didn't use to have module name, and would typically be called mail.jar & activiation.jar, and have module names mail & activiation.
Uptodate com.sun.mail:javax.mail:1.6.2 & com.sun.activation:javax.activation:1.2.0 have module names java.mail and java.activation.
The bcmail-fips-2.0.5 didn't used to have "mail" and "activation" requirements.
The new bcmail-fips-2.0.7 & bcmail-fips-2.1.7 require "mail" and "activation" should they instead require java.mail & java.activation? and should pom.xml be updated on maven central to automatically pull in those deps?