Skip to content

Examples do not compile #71

Description

@OwenTrokeBillard

The examples do not compile.

I followed the build instructions for Linux and attempted to run one of the examples: cargo +enzyme run --example rosenbrock_fwd_iter. There are four compilation errors:

error: cannot find attribute `dup` in this scope
 --> examples/rosenbrock_fwd_iter.rs:4:17
  |
4 | fn rosenbrock(#[dup] x: &[f64; 2]) -> f64 {
  |                 ^^^
error[E0659]: `autodiff` is ambiguous
 --> examples/rosenbrock_fwd_iter.rs:3:3
  |
3 | #[autodiff(d_rosenbrock, Forward, DuplicatedNoNeed)]
  |   ^^^^^^^^ ambiguous name
  |
  = note: ambiguous because of a name conflict with a builtin attribute
  = note: `autodiff` could refer to a built-in attribute
note: `autodiff` could also refer to the attribute macro imported here
 --> examples/rosenbrock_fwd_iter.rs:1:5
  |
1 | use autodiff::autodiff;
  |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  = help: use `crate::autodiff` to refer to this attribute macro unambiguously
error[E0425]: cannot find function `d_rosenbrock` in this scope
  --> examples/rosenbrock_fwd_iter.rs:18:17
   |
4  | fn rosenbrock(#[dup] x: &[f64; 2]) -> f64 {
   | ----------------------------------------- similarly named function `rosenbrock` defined here
...
18 |     let df_dx = d_rosenbrock(&x, &[1.0, 0.0]);
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `rosenbrock`
error[E0425]: cannot find function `d_rosenbrock` in this scope
  --> examples/rosenbrock_fwd_iter.rs:19:17
   |
4  | fn rosenbrock(#[dup] x: &[f64; 2]) -> f64 {
   | ----------------------------------------- similarly named function `rosenbrock` defined here
...
19 |     let df_dy = d_rosenbrock(&x, &[0.0, 1.0]);
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `rosenbrock`

The second error states there are two definitions of the autodiff attribute:

  • One builtin, since the toolchain was built with Enzyme.
  • One in the current project, since the autodiff attribute is also defined in /src/lib.rs.

Two competing definitions of the attribute suggests a configuration issue. Am I missing a step?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions